hey folks!
it's been almost half a decade since the 1st quads (double cheeseburger or not) came out. now i'm thinking of buying a new rig as of late. now the question is with general performance, has hyperthreading reached a point where a hyperthreaded dualcore can match a 1st gen quad ?
areas of concern:
1. cpu bound gaming (the console ports most of the time)
2. android-sdk compile time
3. video encoding
4. multi-gpu setup
5. windows 8 performance
6. will put a 660(non-ti)/7850 or lower.
* would've put power consumption but obviously the 22nm chip will win.
p.s: after watching a vice documentary on youtube about how messed up the environment is i've decided to put the old rig away and switching between a smartphone, atom d2500 (sucks big time), and an xbox360 (what i'm using right now to make this post since the new update made ie available) to do my usual net/game stuffs. now i'm trying to consolidate gaming and net browsing once more.
it's been almost half a decade since the 1st quads (double cheeseburger or not) came out. now i'm thinking of buying a new rig as of late. now the question is with general performance, has hyperthreading reached a point where a hyperthreaded dualcore can match a 1st gen quad ?
areas of concern:
1. cpu bound gaming (the console ports most of the time)
2. android-sdk compile time
3. video encoding
4. multi-gpu setup
5. windows 8 performance
6. will put a 660(non-ti)/7850 or lower.
* would've put power consumption but obviously the 22nm chip will win.
p.s: after watching a vice documentary on youtube about how messed up the environment is i've decided to put the old rig away and switching between a smartphone, atom d2500 (sucks big time), and an xbox360 (what i'm using right now to make this post since the new update made ie available) to do my usual net/game stuffs. now i'm trying to consolidate gaming and net browsing once more.