ASUS K8N-E a Mistake ?

ccc29249

Distinguished
Jun 11, 2004
5
0
18,510
Got my new k8n-e board last week, and a AMD64 XP3000+ to go with it. After a week of toying around i feel the need to vent my frustrations.

ASUS you should be ashamed of yourself !!

Based on the published specs. i decided that this was the "BOARD" to host my new CPU.
Who can resist 6 sata channels, and 8 channel audio ?
Well i should have investigated more intensively before buying.

I currenly own 4 WD Raptors. Now from the specs. of the board it would be possible for me to run these in a Raid-0 configuration. I really had wet dreams of how fast this baby would be....sigh

It was possible to run 4 raptors in raid-0. In fact the board was very easy to install and configure. But when it came to testing, 4 raptors could barely exceed the performance of a single raptor when connected to the onboard SIL3114 controller.

From previous experience with raid controllers (onboard and PCI ones) i know that these are almost always related to the PCI bus in some way, and therefore only run at 33Mhz, which is way below what is needed to make 4 Raptors move.
I went to Silicon Image's homepage and checked the specs. of the SIL3114 chip. I appears that it has a 32bit/66Mhz interface (266mb/s). The question is: How is it connected to the rest of the system. According to Sissoft Sandra and Powerstrip it sits alone on PCI bus 2, which is fine. This ensures that no other device can bring the interface speed down to 33Mhz. However both programs report that PCI bus 2 only runs at PCI clk * 1 (33Mhz).
This would explain why my 4 Raptors perform so badly on the SIL controller. They are simply held back by the bus.
Can anyone verify this ?
If it turns out that ASUS are unable to get a lot more performance out of the SIL controller with future updates
i would call this an unuseable gadget. Its only there so thay can print 6 ch. sata on the box.

For those who's interested in results i can tell you that Sisoft Sandra reports a File System Benchmark average of 87mb/s (burst read is only at 70mb/s).

The BIOS of this board i to say the least, very flawed.
In order to change VCore or multipliers you need to enable a feature called "Cool & Quiet". Now this feature is designed to adjust multiplier and core voltage dynamically thus reducing the need for high fan speeds (noise).
Why would anyone want to increase VCore and then let BIOS decide when its time to raise or lower it ?

Also there are issues with the sound system. When playing Battlefield 1942 with sound hardware acceleration enabled the sound simply garbles after a few seconds of play.
There are no longer any play speach sound nor can i hear when someone drops bombs on my....another annoyance.
I did however manage to get around this by disabling hardware acc. and reducing the number of sound channels to 24.

Conclusion: If you have your eyes on this board, then wait a few months before buying. Hopefully ASUS have corrected these matters by then.
 
PCI is capable of 133MB/s. You'd need a server chipset to support 66MB/s or 64-bit PCI. Add in controllers for PC are PCI based on 33MHz, 133MB/s, regardless of brand. You should have gotten something using nVidia's RAID controller, which is built into the chipset and on a faster bus as I recall.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 
Well thanks for reminding me, but 32bit/66Mhz PCI has been an option in the PCI specs. since revision 2.1.

Since the SIL Raid controller on this board apparently sits on its own PCI bus (bus 2) it could be capable of running at 66Mzh providing that the chipset manufacturer has implemented this. The question is: Have they ?

This raises another question: Why would anyone want to implement a 4 channel raid controller into a mobo and then
leave it cripled by an obsolete bus interface (32bit/33Mhz) when 32bit/66Mhz is allowed and would provide a sufficient interface (266 mb/sec) ?

I could be wrong though since i dont know jack about how the
electronics is actually wired.