Still loses to 780ti by enough that I'd take Gsync, 3 AAA games and knowing with 2.7B in cash and no debt I can expect no phase1 or phase2 BS this year
😉
Hardwarecanucks did a review (and guru3d, about to head off to read that one).
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/64694-asus-r9-290x-directcu-ii-oc-review-5.html
Not impressed, but then we had already seen tomshardware slap a $75 mod on it and it didn't wow me, nor take over 780ti's which hardwarecanucks shows dominate especially the OC/superclocked ones in the list (which can be had for $0-$30 more - who wouldn't pay this for what it scores OC'd?).
Hitman Absolution, Farcry3, AC3, Crysis3, Max Payne 3, Metro Last Light, Tomb Raider, all losses vs. 780TI OC'd cards which to me, is exactly what this 290x card is as it's far more costly than the REF design, so if you're going to call this "finally running like retail should" you need to adjust the price of what we call a REAL 290x right? It is certainly no longer $550/400 (290x/290) and you get no Gsync, 3 AAA games (BF4 instead for AMD?, Which will be the most frustrating xmas gift this year...LOL), and drivers are a serious questions mark for anyone but a total AMD fanboy. Even their fixes get delayed (phase1, phase2 anybody?).
The card won a SINGLE game at hardwarecanucks: Dirt Showdown, which to me is pointless to even benchmark as it still hasn't sold 100K copies on PC (heck only 300K over all platforms, that's a total failure), which is required to even show up on VGchartz.
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=dirt+showdown
I don't think you should bother testing games nobody plays or buys, when you can test things like Starcraft2, Diablo3, WOW, Skyrim (with HD textures or a mod or two etc maxed still potent) etc...All huge sellers STILL being played. I could list many more multimillion unit sellers but you get the point - NV wins in what we play usually(at least this round). It appears toms got a bit more, but then I think their fan was better. Either way just as I said a fan mod wouldn't magically beat 780ti as you can OC the heck out of those too, and any OC 780ti card appears to win without the need to OC yourself. IT already wins out of the box as Gigabyte/Evga show at hardwarecanucks. Even the ref 780ti wins 1/2 the games vs. this card.
It looks like this card is priced at $600 (superbiizz has it priced, though I think MSRP is $570). If that is true, take 780ti with 3 AAA games and Gsync. Also note the lowest temps on a card in that review above is 71c of ...wait for it...EVGA Superclocked 780ti...So there is another 12c you can play with to overclock the already SUPERCLOCKED card. Even the Gigabyte OC 780ti is 72c...Where is the ASUS 290x DirectCU card? 78c. So you're never going to catch them when even the MOD can't get you to their temps. AMD'ers need to face the fact that NV put out a superior chip this time. Period.
Another important note, when in SILENT mode 290x runs right back up to 94 even on this modded card. So unless you think the DirectCU II Top 290x has a crappy fan/heatsink solution, you are not going to get more. Your NON-REF card is finally here, and it still loses. What now? Add games or reduce prices. I hope they do neither but guess they'll do one or both after xmas sales are over and you are selling to GAMERS instead of MINERS. Clearly NV's ref cooling solution is not as great as we thought, NV just had the better chip. Because the OC/SC cards in the review drop the temps 11/12c AND are overclocked. So essentially a great fan on NV totally killed the fan upgrade on AMD's 290x. The ASUS solution is better than ref clearly, but nothing but liquid will really speed this past 780ti and you can put the same liquid together with NV also. Also note even with the NON-REF ASUS card they still lose the NOISE race. OUCH.
The only thing I see that AMD closed the gap on was watts. That part is basically a wash. Even on the OC page where they OC's the Asus card, it still lost to BOTH 780ti's that are OUT OF THE BOX in Crysis3/Tomb Raider (the only two they tested with OC'd Asus). They hit 1200+mhz so AMD lost this round. Nothing will end the pain until they produce their next cards. AT this point you only have price and free games to fight with. We are clear now, fans won't kill NV's lead. Can't buy until Jan and MSRP is $570, but I doubt that as I already see $600+ for this card. I'm sure miners will run these out of stock also.
Guru3d shows basically the same, loses every game to 780ti (NOT OC'd, but just REF) except for Hitman Absolution (which of course would lose if against an OC card just like it lost at hardwarecanucks). Not sure why they don't put an OC card in the list for NV. Even at 4K at guru3d the 780ti REF card won 3/4 game tests. So you'd easily lose even the 4th game if you buy an OC card for $30 or if they would have shown 780TI ref even in the Hitman benchmark at 4k (oddly left out, so 290x won vs. 780 NON TI). NV still wins, though you have to realize you won't run there, of the 4 tests 3 were 35fps avg or less and the 4th only hit 42fps, so you'll be playing with mins near 20fps. NOT playable.
Guru3d reviewed the MSI GeForce GTX 780 Ti Gaming Edition on 12/11, so not sure why they are not comparing it in their ASUS 290x DirectCU II review. I guess they wanted to give AMD a fighting chance
😉 The MSI card is $699 and OC'd out of the box FREE and hit an extra ~150-170mhz on top (depending on gaming or oc mode being run OOBE) adding another ~10% to it's scores. It runs 980/1046 in gaming mode vs. ref 876/928 and also has an OC mode that pushes to 1020/1085 for newbs so even more perf & already good without mucking with software etc. Newbs will get a very good experience with no need to even know what Ocing is (which for guru3d they hit 1225mhz). I'm unimpressed by AMD right now.