[citation][nom]internetlad[/nom]Company of Heroes is a fantastic RTS, worth playing if only for it's story.I never felt as if the AI "Cheated" me during CoH, and on most levels it seems as though the player is given the upper hand as you can often go at your own pace and the enemy rarely pushes the frontline, choosing to defend it's own territory (there are a couple of missions where the enemy will counter your attack or flank you but it's not the type of game that just throws a wall of units at you. Everything is fairly evenly matched.)Everybody is sayin SRTT is worth the 5.60, I'd say easily that CoH is worth it, despite being older.I think they're trying to drum up buzz for CoH 2 and the SRTT DLC. They probably threw in Titan Quest simply because everybody owns it by now (it's gone on xmas sale for like 3 dollars the past few years.)[/citation]
well, now im thinking of getting it for the CoH, the part in strat games i hate the most, is i have my objective, half way through the map, at what could be 15-30 minutes into the match, something happens, and my team is completely screwed, no chance in winning because of something that happened off screen. so that means that 30 minutes of preperation all went down the drain because i prepared for a different scenerio than they gave me half way through.
the only kind of game play style i hate more than the poorly done escort mission (resident evil 4 managed to pull it off right) is the style where the only way you can win is by knowing what comes next, and the only way to know is to die. and compound that with how many games with that style of gameplay also have maps or missions that go on for WAY to long...
does CoH do that at all? or does it feel like its all your bad when you lose in singleplayer?