G
Guest
Guest
Which should be faster???
I used to have a CL PCI BANSHEE (16MB) clocked @105/115 core/mem. usually res was 800*600 or 1024*768 on full texture details.
The banshee only has a single texture unit.
The TNT 1 is an STB 16MB AGP2X clocked at 105/115, with an agp aperture size of 32MB (from 128MB ram). usually res 640*480 medium-low texture details. The TNT1 has dual texture units! (tried 64MB aperture size, didn't make much difference)
When running most games on the banshee (glide, opengl &d3d) the framerates were higher.
When running on the TNT1 it seems a little sluggish, indications that the frame rate is just a weeeee bit low.
sys specs
c466@525 (agp=75/150)
(pci=75/37.5)
128MB PC133 ram
Aopen ax6bc MOBO (agp2, PIII, slot1)
SBlive value
fujitsu 13GB HD (IDE/ata33)
Anything else relevant?
Any suggestions???
I used to have a CL PCI BANSHEE (16MB) clocked @105/115 core/mem. usually res was 800*600 or 1024*768 on full texture details.
The banshee only has a single texture unit.
The TNT 1 is an STB 16MB AGP2X clocked at 105/115, with an agp aperture size of 32MB (from 128MB ram). usually res 640*480 medium-low texture details. The TNT1 has dual texture units! (tried 64MB aperture size, didn't make much difference)
When running most games on the banshee (glide, opengl &d3d) the framerates were higher.
When running on the TNT1 it seems a little sluggish, indications that the frame rate is just a weeeee bit low.
sys specs
c466@525 (agp=75/150)
(pci=75/37.5)
128MB PC133 ram
Aopen ax6bc MOBO (agp2, PIII, slot1)
SBlive value
fujitsu 13GB HD (IDE/ata33)
Anything else relevant?
Any suggestions???