Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (
More info?)
You seem to have missed my point completely, aswell as trying to personally
attack me to try and show how great you are...
I wasn't talking about stats and never did I talk about stats, I agree with
you that stats could make a bad player look good and they don't measure what
people do to help the team. Tournaments can go some way to measuring these
kind of things as there is more to winning a tournament than just kills.
What I was trying to say is that you can't just come in here saying how
great you and your friends are and expect us to take it as being credable.
However, if you had won some recognised tournament then we would have
something to measure you on.
"you sir, are a hypocrite and probably, someone that engages in clan-tard
matches where all of you run around telling each other how good you are."
Hmmmm, no you are the only one running around telling people how good you
are, arent you the Hypocrite?
Not only did you misinterpret what I was saying and went off on some tangent
about statistics, you also make some silly assumptions about me.
"I happen to be a redneck and I often out perform folks that think
they're better than me, in my profession and online. folks just like you."
See, this just shows that you really arent as smart as you think you are.
Try coming back here once you have grown up abit.
"Colonel_Flagg" <colonel_flagg@_NOSOUPFORJ00_internetwarzone.org> wrote in
message news:MPG.1c626f65900eb62d9896c5@nntp.charter.net...
> In article <6OZJd.12102$mo2.930297@news.xtra.co.nz>, none@none.com
> says...
>
> > "BTW, the next time you are outside, have a good look around, notice all
> > > those other people in the world, there are billions of us, IOW, you
aren't
> > > alone and you are as important as you think you are, and neither is
your
> > > 'leet' clan. "
> >
>
> evidently, you lack the insight to understand when someone is being
> facetious. I expressly pointed out, anything -----below this line---- is
> for the troll attempting to get a rise out of me by misinterpreting that
> which I have written.
>
>
>
> > Hmm, I second this. You can't come into an open forum and gloat about
how
> > great you are with a couple of Jpegs. For all we know, you were playing
15
> > slack jawed retard rednecks.
> >
>
> I happen to be a redneck and I often out perform folks that think
> they're better than me, in my profession and online. folks just like
> you.
>
>
> > Until you have done well in a proper, recognised tournament you are no
one.
>
> you sir, are a hypocrite and probably, someone that engages in clan-tard
> matches where all of you run around telling each other how good you are.
>
> the best players i've ever seen in this game, belong to no clan. of
> course, the best players i've seen in this game, don't necessarily have
> the best overall stats either. they're the folks that make critical
> kills, the folks that hold their own in every aspect of the game plus,
> they'll be the one to stop the enemy flag carrier at just the right
> moment.
>
> statistics are geared toward a bare minimum of criteria. things that can
> be counted by a computer. you currently cannot count, unless you modify
> your server, the number of times a player stops another player from
> taking a spawn, which is sometimes much more important than the simple
> kill point and spawn cap points they receive. you also cannot properly
> count the number of times a player stops the flag carrier 5 ft. from
> capping the flag. sure, they get points for doing it, but "timing" is
> everything. they had the ability to get in position and make the
> critical stop. they bypassed all kills along the way in order to
> stealthly enter the enemy base and setup for the critical kill.
>
> most clan-tards will kill everything along the way and subject
> themselves to the likelihood that they'll be killed while trying to get
> there when the point is, to get there and make ONE KILL, not 10 or 20.
> most anyone interested in their personal stats would rather KILL KILL
> KILL than interest themselves in stopping the flag carrier unless it's
> convenient. this is one reason i really like CTF over CQ. while CTF
> still has a number of folks more interested in themselves than the team,
> CTF garners more team oriented players.
>
> I know for a fact that one of the most popular BF stats programs for
> individual servers, SelectBF, has enough bad programming in it that when
> it's ran against a stats file, it kicks out statistics that falls
> outside it's parameters. perhaps the bigger websites that host
> statistics for games don't have these problems, how can we be sure? how
> do we know all statistics are really being counted? we cannot be sure.
> therefore, who's to say that EA won't have skewed data as well?
>
>
>
> /CF
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram