@Wamphryi
Completely agree, the biggest issue with the start screen is simply that it is a disorganized mess. I organized mine so that the first column is all the stuff I want to see: Desktop first as a large tile, followed by large tiles for email, chat, weather, and a news feed. Next column is for social stuff, so the Social app gets a big tile, and all the people I check up on follow with small tiles, and I rarely have to go to the FB page anymore unless I need to post something for work. Next come the media apps, WMP, VLC, QT, Picture Viewer, Paint, Music, Skydrive, etc. Next is games, all of them both metro and desktop all fit nicely in there. Then come utilities, so things like antivirus, graphics, benchmarks, hardware tests, hardware utilities, ccleaner, etc. Then comes productivity, so the adobe suite, office, etc (these are also pinned to the superbar on the desktop... they are not behind games because I slack off all the time... really 😀 ). Lastly are the newly installed apps.
Each column is neatly separated, labeled, and it is super easy to add a new category. When I need to find something not on the list I can just start typing and it shows up instantly. I really is so much more usable than the old school start menu, the problem is that it took me a month to figure out how I wanted things, and to figure out all the nifty little tricks, and I probably would not have figured out how to label a group except that I stumbled upon the feature with a touch screen, and it took a while to figure out how to get to it on keys and mouse (ctrl+scroll wheel down, then rt click on a group, and rename from the context menu). The fact it is that hard to know how to do it is entirely MS's fault for not making features readily apparent, but once you know how to do it, it works really really well.