Best Graphics Cards For The Money: January 2012 (Archive)

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Roger Rogers writes:
> Thanks; I will look at V4.

Actually you were kinda right, there is an Advanced edition and a Pro edition. I guess I never
noticed as the free version has pretty much everything one needs anyway, except for the AF
setting, so I set that manually in NCP/CCC (beats me why they removed it from earlier editions).


> I`m not sure where to start with that lot.

😀

One of these days I'll get round to writing some kind of general intro page to it all, but not just
yet, I'd like to get a few hundred more tests and other configs included first.


> But looking deeper, there is detail with images for simple minds like mine. 😀

Note that most of the pages are plain text. Not sure about the wisdom of this, but it does mean
the tables should always be displayed correctly.


> But AF is new to me; like almost all the PC detail tech terms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropic_filtering

For anyone completely new to gfx terms, I wrote the first site on the N64 with a general intro many years ago:

http://www.sgidepot.co.uk/graphics.html

but a lot has changed since then, many new concepts and functions, so probably a Google and check on the
wiki site is the best way to get info for anything modern.


> I recall a few winters skiing at Aviemore. Many years ago.

Fairly sure if I ever try skiing I'll just end up in a tree. :|


> Good luck with the competition for the 7970.

Patience, as they say. 😀


> I also think the Americans have great pricing. But its hidden by massive national debt.

Heh, you should see the UK's equivalent. It's worse than the US debt on a per capita basis,
by a long way. And personal credit card debt here is 5X higher than the US. Americans
absorbed the lessons of the 2008 crash, use of credit cards declined a lot; in the UK, nothing
really changed at all.


> My family and I live in Central Japan (5 years); and prices here are still way over $1,000 for a 7990.

There are a couple of 7990 models which cost that much here, but most are more like $800 equivalent,
though I notice the supply is very limited atm (checked just now, Scan has none in stock, Aria has only
one model with limited supply, though Dabs has a few).


> ... dropping the prices of existing ones for the average joe.

That's when I start trying to get them for my benchmarking stuff. 😀

Ian.

 


The trick to getting past the old comments when an article is updated is to note
the date of the new update, then go to this page:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/forum-56.html

Select the thread you want, click on Newest to go to the last page of comments,
if necessary go back a page or two but either way then just scroll down to the
first post that has a date stamp newer than the article update.

Ian.

 


Ever wonder why the price categories change each month ? Each side has to show "winners" on both teams or one of them gets pissed off.

 


Haha, right? Even I'll admit (converted to Nvidia this year) that AMD wins this month. Those prices and game bundles! Glad there wasn't a <$199 HD 7870 at the end of July or I might've bought that instead.
 


He obviously refers to GPU hierarchy and not the best GPU for x $. There was not a single day that a 7970GE was at the same performance with a GTX780. Not even close. And as you can see he also refers that 7970GE is not equal to a 6990 which obviously again is from AMD so its not about green or red team, its about misleading people....
 
Dear; Memnarc

QUOTE
He obviously refers to GPU hierarchy and not the best GPU for x $. There was not a single day that a 7970GE was at the same performance with a GTX780. Not even close. And as you can see he also refers that 7970GE is not equal to a 6990 which obviously again is from AMD so its not about green or red team, its about misleading people....

:)
May I interject?

Check this site-page....

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_value.html
 


You are joking, right? :sarcastic:
 


Sure hope so. Passmark *shudders*.
 


Some people are not made of magic-money (like the Federal Reserve used to be).

As I read it; the crux of the comment was about performance per dollar; not about outright performance and ah heck the cost.

Cost does come into it somewhere; does it not?

And you know the software (e.g. `Games`) is/are limited in what it will do, even with the best graphics cards.

Devil 13.
Such a nice card.
Could fit two in my PC. But at the price of four assault rifles and ammo.

Call me pragmatic.
:na:
 


It is called the next gen AMD cards are not far off and they are trying to clear up some inventory to make room.
 


You don't understand. Our problem wasn't if you linked a performance per dollar chart.
Is that this performance is made by using passmark. That's why it fails. Passmark is one of the worst benchmarks I have ever seen both for CPUs and GPUs. It doesn't show the real world performance.
According to them GTX580 is faster than HD7990 😛 and GTX670 is faster than GTX690.

Just no comment...
 


I've noticed that passmark ranks GPUs according to the average FPS they give in games
 
Um. 760 > 7990, too. And about the top ten spots are held by nVidia cards.

Sorry, but I'll trust people like say AnandTech. Not a company which uses a single flawed benchmark.

You can have however many data points you like, but it doesn't fix the fact that your methodology is flawed.
 
Passmark just use a program and not games for the benchmarks (actually passmark is a benchmark for people that don't know...). Yet is so untrusty that gives beyond accurate, more like wierd results... Someone typed that they have GTX760 better than 7990. They even have GTX580 better than 7990 lol....
But let's say that this benchmark favors Nvidia. What the hell GTX670>GTX690?????
I stopped reading there.... I am sure people can find more wierd results...
 


I never said that i trust that site, i just mentioned what i noticed. I'm not even sure that passmark tests more than one GPU of the same model. No two GPUs are alike. As for 7990 and 690, it seems that the tests are made on one of the cores only.
 


You know that a GTX690 is made by two GTX680 (at lower hz) which ofc, one GTX680 is faster than a GTX670. So your point of the test using only one GPU (and not core 1536x2 for GTX690 and 1344 for GTX670) is invalid.
 


That was the bait actually. And thank you for biting it.
GTX670 and GTX690 have the exact same clocks. 915Mhz.
And same memory speeds. 6008Mhz.
But GTX690 has higher boost clocks 1019 vs 980 at GTX670.
And also the cores. 1536 (I am not counting the second one as we dont have support at the magnificent test called passmark) vs 1344.

edit: Thanks for your cooperation. 😛
 
I think it'd be nice to also see categories for best small form factor gaming; I know that's still pretty niche, but for those who want smaller cases it can be difficult to decide which is the best option that can fit a low-profile PCIe slot and/or is single-height. There are lots of great full-width, double height cards around, and ones that require powerful PSUs, but help in finding good value in a small/efficient size wouldn't go amiss :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.