Best Graphics Cards For The Money: January 2012 (Archive)

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

the gfx card hierarchy chart? it has mobile gpus. listed under 'mobility' in the amd column. afaik, the 'mobility' gpus usually mean discreet mobile gpus and 'discreet' means discreet desktop gpus.. igpus are differently listed under 'integrated' label.
 


How did I miss that? :ouch: My apologies.
 

The 7990 is still affected by the Crossfire problems. Those have been largely solved when running DX11-mode games on a single monitor, but DX9 and multiple monitors are not supported by the fix. So if you want DX9 and/or multiple monitors, then Nvidia is a better choice.
 

No, the API for the Xbone is Direct3D.
 


neither the 7970/280x or the 770 are fast enough to "use" more then 2gb of vram. even in games which need more ram, there is no ram bottlenecking on either card.

HOWEVER, in SLi/xfire those cards are MORE then fast enough to use more then 2gb of vram. We're seeing it right now in BF4 beta, that 2gb 770s, 670s and 680s in SLi or the 690 are being RAM bottlenecked, because at 1080p and full graphic splender, that game consistently uses a little more then 2gb of vram.

The result is xfired 7950s/7970s and the 7990 consistently kick out far higher frame rates and much better frame latency numbers their their nvidia buddies. It's a vram issue not an SLi issue. the high end 2gb cards have too little ram for games that use massive amounts of vram.

that said, as far as i can see that's the only game (thus far) that is being ram bottlenecked by high end nvidia cards.
 
"As an aside, the entry-level Radeon HD 7730 disappeared from Newegg."

As far I can tell there are very few 7730 cards out there being sold by retailers. I can only find one by MSI as of today. Did AMD kill this product? Are they ever coming to market or did manufacturers pass on the 7730 product?
 
Never seen this model mention by any of the AMD partners, ASUS, Sapphire, HIS, MSI, or Powercolor. May have been a very limited run for an OEM and they sold off the extra quickly.

It's a great time to be buying a video card with price/performance the way it is now.
 


That is no kidding why the hell would you recommend a 770 for $100 more when the r9 trades blows with it in your own bench test? That is ludicrous.
 


Wrong. It's the API used for the new consoles - which will make it take off rather quickly.
 


I guess you missed this little news item:

"AMD Mantle Not Meant for Xbox One and PlayStation 4"
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-mantle-api-xbox-one-directx-11.2,24691.html
 


Yup it's D3D.

AMD caused a lot of confusion about Mantle, and AnandTech pretty much added to the confusion.
 

I pretty much agree with what you're saying. i think Glide is the perfect example of why Mantle isn't a great idea, and PhysX is the perfect example of why Mantle may not gain wide traction.

Anyway, 9x greater draw calls means little if the GPU is the bottleneck, imo. The real advantage from Mantle will be seen by GCN APUs.
 
For October the real bargain is the Powercolor 7870 Myst (Tahiti LE) going for $180 on Newegg. Surprised you missed that.

(Even better are the refurbs going for $135, out of scope for this article, but holy #$%^ what a deal!)
 
Looks like my HD7770 1GB is roughly equivalent to my old GTX 460 1GB with the exception of DX11 support and hopefully less power usage than the 460.
 

You can get a 7950 for $180, so a 7870 XT for the same price is a bad deal.
 
The GeForce GTX 770 is recommended at $400. This card was excluded from the Radeon R9 208X review benchmarks, but mentioned as Nvidia's higher performing card in the article. It is also shown as outperforming the Radeon R9 280X on the performance per dollar chart. Why is the GTX 770 shown as one tier below the 7970 GHz edition and R9 280X on the hierarchy chart?
 
The GeForce GTX 770 is recommended at $400. This card was excluded from the Radeon R9 208X review benchmarks, but mentioned as Nvidia's higher performing card in the article. It is also shown as outperforming the Radeon R9 280X on the performance per dollar chart. Why is the GTX 770 shown as one tier below the 7970 GHz edition and R9 280X on the hierarchy chart?
 
Ever since NewEgg screwed [H] a few years back, it's Amazon all the way.

A shame, too. I've spent over $25k with NE in the past 8 years.
 
Really hoping the upcoming GTX 780 Ti will drive down the price of the stock GTX 780 price by 10-15%. If its 10% faster than the stock card, and the same price, the 780 Ti will be uber-desirable for us 3D fans.
 


I would not think that you can get a big performance increase on that Ti model because it's still based in the same core of the current GTX 7xx models.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.