I also run windows 10 and the one function i miss in updates settings is the hide function.
I used to have Win 7 Pro (before that: Win XP Pro, before that: Win 98SE, before that: Win 95, before that: Win 3.1, before that: Norton Commander, before that: MS DOS) and in Win 7 Pro, yes, you did have the option to disable all updates, both optional and required.
On Win10 Pro, you can opt-out from optional updates, but required updates will come regardless. Best you can do, is postpone required update up to 2 weeks, making little difference.
Micro$oft has the idea that most end users doesn't know any better, hence why they force the updates on to everybody. Bulk of the PC users really doesn't know any better, but it's the power users, who do know better, to whom that mandatory update is annoying. And while there are some half-baked workarounds for disabling mandatory updates, best would be not to use the OS meant for masses. Instead, using far better OS would be preferred, e.g any GNU/Linux distro.
I do have GNU/Linux distro on my laptop, Lubuntu and i also have Linux Mint on USB thumb drive as bootable OS, just in case Windows decides to crap out on me. Though, only reason why i still put up with Windows is, that i like to play games casually and GNU/Linux distros doesn't support gaming as smooth as Windows does.
Perhaps, one day, gaming on GNU/Linux distro is as smooth as on Windows and i can get rid of the Windows once and for all.
I am in england and a pc magazine reported 1,000's of pc's getting hit with problems because an update bug decided that all of a sudden your pc can run windows 11 even if you knew it cant.
The requirements of Win 11, to have at least 9th gen Intel CPU, in my opinion, is bollocks. I have 4th gen and 6th gen Intel Core i5 CPUs in use, and performance wise alone, my 6th gen i5-6600K is far superior to e.g 9th gen Celeron G4930. Yet, big wigs in Micro$oft decided that i can not run Win 11 on my machine, which is still very much relevant and performs exactly to my needs.