And it would seem that you need to learn how to read.
Thanks. There are 5 pages in this thread and I've been keeping up with it. I was writing my post at the same time as vrec, so there was no mention of him placing his order when I posted.
I'm just saying that maybe you should consider waiting so that you don't have to waster your cash disposable parts. If you're moving up from a 300 MHz celeron, then I doubt you'd be missing much if you hold off on a new computer for a couple more months. I guess it's too late now. Good luck with your system.
As for wide-screen LCD's, DVI is digital and VGA and composite are analog. It's really more marketing than anything, though. Coming from a computer you're not going to see a difference at all. DVI
is better than composite, s-video, and RCA, for different reasons, but I suspect the move to HDMI is really just to reduce the number of different transmission methods, and to move to pure digital for better quality.
You'll see most TV's with HDMI, though, which is really just DVI with sound. DVI is good because LCD's are digital, and tubes are analog. Coming from the computer, if the signal is VGA (Analog), the monitor has to convert the signal to digital. DVI to LCD, there's no conversion and hence no potential for quality loss during conversion. There was question as to the feasability for 1080p and higher with composite video, so HDMI is definately the best solution. HDMI has a 5Gb max throughput, and I beileve 1080i only uses 1/2 of that.
Latency for LCD TV's are uaully a lot slower than LCD's for computers, so I would say do your research first. Most LCD's (and especially plasmas) aren't good AT ALL if you console-game, due to high-latency and burn-in. Waiting for nano-tech LCD's would be your best bet unless you have the cash. CRT's are awesome (I have a samsung HD slim-fit tube that looks amazing, at < 1/2 the cost of an LCD). Tubes are brighter, too.