@Raiddinn
Also, belardo, I think you really don't have any idea about the costs that are incurred trying to build software and how much money has to go into the selling price to recover those costs, etc. You might not want to comment about what is overpriced if you really have no idea what constitutes overpricing.
It really has more to do with the millions of people who don't pay the prices they are supposed to for things. If everyone did that, the prices needed to recover the creation costs would be a whole lot more reasonable.
LOL... you are a funny character. M$ is so struggling to keep the lights on. Funny, how companies like LinuxMint, Utunbu, Redhat and others are in business and yet they give away their OS for free. Apple Sells their upgrades for $30 a single Mac or $50 for 5 Macs. MS usually sells their upgrade OS for $100, yet for Win8 - they are trying to get people to buy that turkey for $40.
Microsoft makes MILLIONS a month selling Windows for $30 each to the OEMS (Dell/HP/Acer/Lenovo/etc) which is the bulk of their profits. Yet how come we don't get it for $50?
The rules for the OEM OS is that it is installed on a NEW computer. That is it. I can easily order WindowsOS from a distributor, not show them or MS any paperwork and legally buy and install their OS. (I stopped dealing with Distributors because of the hassle of RMA, time, availability etc - I sell PCs at cost+labor)
If selling the OEM Windows7 is ILLEGAL, Microsoft can make a phone call to each of those companies and say "STOP OR WE WILL KILL YOU". The OEM version comes in an ugly brown plan envelope. The avg computer user is not going to know anything about it. Look at all the PC cases, motherboards and CPUs on Newegg & Tiger direct. You HONESTLY think most people are dropping $200~300 for the OS for a PC build in which the hardware is $400~600?!
Please find an article or anything in which Microsoft has SUED somebody for buying the $100 OS and using it on a computer.
They are two different things.
Retail ($200) = unlimited re-installs on different hardware (1 computer) with some tech support from Microsoft. You get a pretty box.
OEM ($100) = Install on a new computer (should last 2~8 years). No support from Microsoft. MS gets their $100 and don't have to deal with YOU if something goes wrong... they'll gladly charge you a service fee if you need help.
So yes, $100 for Windows *IS* over-priced. It can easily be the most expensive part of a PC build for a basic or budget computer.
A client's HP notebook had an HD failure. The recovery discs failed. My generic OEM WinXP disc wouldn't accept the HP key. So the client had to spend $120 for OEM XP-MCE to do a clean install.
hence, Microsoft has the crappiest and dumbest OS packages available. It makes it harder to repair peoples computers. And for that headache, $100~200 for Home is over-priced.
Want to use LinuxMint? Just download it. They have two versions (desktop styles) and choose between 32 or 64bit. No upgrade, no OEM, no retail, No jumping through hoops (of course gaming and childrens software is an issue). And when my kid is tired of his PC games... I'm planning on replacing Windows with Linux on his computer. His console will work fine for gaming.
Lets see, what would happen is MS drop the hammer and said "NO OEM FOR YOU!" and every DIY person had to buy a $200 license? That would put people like ME, out of business... I would push my clients to MacOS at that point. Windows Piracy will go up and Linux user base will also go up.
Personally, I want Windows to die, no longer be the dominate OS. Other than a few games and my Photoshop software (6 years old, but hey - it works) and a few windows-only tools, I'm still using Windows for now. I think within 1~3 years, I can migrate to Linux and keep an OLD Core-i5 as a legacy Windows7 gaming box.
Each year, MS-Windows looses its relevance. Win7's value was worth $100 3 years ago... today... $40~50 would be fair. And Microsoft thinks so too with their offer of Win8 upgrade at $40. But to me, Win8 is overpriced if it sold for $1. Other than a platform to run MS-Office, Windows is rarely needed by consumers as proven by Android, ChromeOS and of course iOS on the iPad.
PS: MS hasn't raised the price of Windows because NON-OEM are buying OEM Windows. Pricing has been the same for OEM since the days of Windows 3.1!
$100 = Windows 3.1 and MS-DOS 6.x (70/30 split if I remember right)
$100 = Windows 95
$100 = Windows 98
$100 = Windows 98se
$100 = Windows Me (I still have this crap disc! Only used once!)
$100 = Windows XP
$100 = Windows vista
$100 = Windows 7 (had a $150 3x user pak)
$ 40 = Windows 8 (Limited time)
* All of the above refers to the Standard/Home editions. PRO versions have been $140~150 (Win2000, XP, vista, Win7, Win8)
So where exactly is the
Microsoft has to increase the price of both the OEM version and the retail version.
that you speak of?! Making statements that are NOT true is not a way of selling your point, unless you work "news" network, which still doesn't make it true.
I've been computing since the days of 1Mhz/floppy systems. I've managed a computer store and have built over 800 PCs with my hands. I've done the P.O.'s with various vendors and know how much things costs. I've even had a small software company for a while and I've seen my OLD software being pirated. (Don't care anymore, company long dead). MS is fine with the OEM gray market, its all profit.