And besides, I don't hate that he is given notoriety -- I am protesting the way it is done.
He is basically being mystified as some great tech guru, articles published don't go in any depth about his work, they are shallow and vague, full of bombastic statements wiithout substance -- they don't critically analyze any of his claims, just parrot them and expect us to take them for granted.
Sites like Toms are aimed at the largest audience possible, within their niche. I don't see them go into that kind of detail with anyone. If you want to see more substantive interviews, then perhaps you're looking in the wrong places.
To me those hype articles with their low effort way in which they are presenting him and Jensen and the others are actually putting an equal sign between sport / media celebrities and people who do actual science and engineering. Frankly, I am surprised that such equalization doesn't bother you.
First, I have also frequently taken issue with Jensen being deified and his words treated as particularly insightful.
Second, this article isn't about Jim Keller. It's about a startup offering a new product - namely, their prebuilt AI PCs - which was announced by their CEO. That CEO happens to be Jim Keller, and he's definitely trading some of his name cred to help his company. It happens all the time. Still, the article isn't about him. It's about their products. So, your remarks about him are somewhat missing that point.
It wouldn't. It need not be a full biography, he could use ChatGPT to summarize important bits of his work.
That Anandtech article I linked was written 3 years ago. ChatGPT wasn't a thing, back then. LLMs existed, but not of a caliber that could be used to generate such content.
Now, I would love it, if there were a LLM that could read all of his patents, other publications, and every other tidbit of detail published about the products he worked on, and then be prompted to talk about salient aspects of them, highlighting his contributions. Or, someone could just ask him and get it from the horse's mouth. He doesn't seem like a terribly self-aggrandizing person, but maybe you can
actually read (or watch) some of the interviews with him, and decide for yourself.
That's what the proper interviews and real journalists are for -- to tell us why he is important by mentioning most important accomplishments, not by saying "he is important because he is a CPU god".
Except, isn't it kind of rude to do an investigative piece - especially one involving interviews - on whether person XYZ is
really such a big deal? Who would even sit down, for such an interview?
What you might find is people doing retrospectives on some of the projects he happened to be involved in, like DEC Alpha or AMD K8. You might learn some things about him, from that.
Because you asked me to give those names which I did and it's a basic curtesy to respond if I already bothered to fulfill your request.
At the same time as you did that, you also posted FUD that caused me to lose faith that we were engaging in an intellectually honest discussion. If I can't trust what you're saying then I'm not going to invest time in it. It's really that simple.
You are avoiding to respond to that because it won't help your argument that he deserves to be hyped
Nope. I don't care what you think about him. Believe whatever you like.