SOLVED:
Created ACL 86 to include the IP of my test host
Standard IP access list 86
10 permit 192.168.1.120 (8789 matches)
Added route-map InternetVPN
route-map InternetVPN permit 10
match ip address 86
set interface Dialer3
On int Fa0 (def gw) I assigned policy "ip policy route-map InternetVPN"
Worked! I've always used next-hop and never even looked for interface. Thanks!
=======================================
My ISP is on dialer 3 - no problem
My VPN is on dialer 2 - no problem
The unknown route is toward dialer3. So all traffic goes out the ISP connection.
I'm trying to force a pair of LAN hosts to route out dialer2 as their default gateway. Both hosts are statically IP'd. I think I need to use policy based routing, but how to use it by referencing the interface? I have tried multiple unknown routes; one to dialer2 and the other to dialer3. But without a way to determine the source host/IP I cannot make a routing decision.
Fa0 = 192.168.1.254 (LAN def gw)
Di3 = ISP
Di2 = VPN
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to Di3 sends all traffic to ISP
What I want are for two 192.168.1.x hosts to hit Fa0 and then traverse the router exiting Di2 instead of the 0.0.0.0 route to Di3.
I don't want to route based on destination IP because that will vary too much. I need the hosts to be "nailed up" to the VPN dialer2 for all traffic, not just some subnets.
Is this a do-able scenario?
Created ACL 86 to include the IP of my test host
Standard IP access list 86
10 permit 192.168.1.120 (8789 matches)
Added route-map InternetVPN
route-map InternetVPN permit 10
match ip address 86
set interface Dialer3
On int Fa0 (def gw) I assigned policy "ip policy route-map InternetVPN"
Worked! I've always used next-hop and never even looked for interface. Thanks!
=======================================
My ISP is on dialer 3 - no problem
My VPN is on dialer 2 - no problem
The unknown route is toward dialer3. So all traffic goes out the ISP connection.
I'm trying to force a pair of LAN hosts to route out dialer2 as their default gateway. Both hosts are statically IP'd. I think I need to use policy based routing, but how to use it by referencing the interface? I have tried multiple unknown routes; one to dialer2 and the other to dialer3. But without a way to determine the source host/IP I cannot make a routing decision.
Fa0 = 192.168.1.254 (LAN def gw)
Di3 = ISP
Di2 = VPN
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to Di3 sends all traffic to ISP
What I want are for two 192.168.1.x hosts to hit Fa0 and then traverse the router exiting Di2 instead of the 0.0.0.0 route to Di3.
I don't want to route based on destination IP because that will vary too much. I need the hosts to be "nailed up" to the VPN dialer2 for all traffic, not just some subnets.
Is this a do-able scenario?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram