How he said what he said has nothing to do with what he said, tho its as if it were as some people would want to point out.
However, talking about Gitmo, mentioning having terrorists being put to trial in downtown New York, and mentioning what a poor ideal and idea, and how lacking, insensitive and foolish such a thing would be, and Obamas supposed reaction goes right in line with not having a lawyer for president, as its a sick mentality to go thru such things in such ways, which lifts the laws higher than the very will of common sense made sense to me, and not about qhich approach he took.
He wasnt trying to be cooler than anyone else, nor popular as well, just pointing out a few things our current leader believes in fiercely, wasnt trying to be smooth, wasnt trying to create a seperation, which are things that are harmful and trivial, foolish and weak.
He was being a man, not a wimp, wasnt creating victims, wasnt creating bad guys, simply commenting on foolish ideals, foolish responses, not getting twisted into all the bull, but being a man, having his say his way.
It hurts more to those who championed those such as Michael Moore and such, who isnt the man Clint is, will never be, and doesnt even have a clue as to start being so.
As someone has said, it disqualifies feminists, as they look to Uncle Sam for freebies, so too it shows the hypocracy of those who think its cool to listen to nothing but slams with twists coming from those in Hollywood, but cant attack the message, not the messenger directly, but how the message was delivered, as one blow brings them to their knees, and their responses are not those of men, but accusationial children