It's a SATA M2 though, so you'll only get SATA III speeds. Not really worth it. It performs worse than most new 2.5" SATA SSD's (Read 550MB/s, Write 200MB/s, 90k/48k IOPS )
It's a SATA M2 though, so you'll only get SATA III speeds. Not really worth it. It performs worse than most new 2.5" SATA SSD's (Read 550MB/s, Write 200MB/s, 90k/48k IOPS )
Obviously a PCIE NVME interface M2 would be much faster, but cost a lot more.
All I'm looking for is a small and quick boot drive to put into a pre existing build, just to speed it all up a bit, so I'm just looking for what is adequate and cheap
Compared to most SSD's yes. Thats why its so cheap. Compared to a 3.5" rotational HDD it's fast, and faster than the Kingston M2 you linked too. These are budget SSD's we are talking about.
In the reviews people show read and write speeds of about 150 MB/s which isn't very fast though right? Especially when it says it's supposed to be 400-500
Yeah it doesnt have great reviews I admit, and tbh I'd really, really try to get a better one. That M2 wont be great either. Anandtech had some ok results with the V300 and benchmarks are subject to so many variables but I agree it isnt the best http://www.anandtech.com/show/6733/kingston-ssdnow-v300-review/2
Seq read/write speeds arent even that relevant. Random IOPS and latency will count more in everyday tasks.
Yeah it doesnt have great reviews I admit, and tbh I'd really, really try to get a better one. That M2 wont be great either. Anandtech had some ok results with the V300 and benchmarks are subject to so many variables but I agree it isnt the best http://www.anandtech.com/show/6733/kingston-ssdnow-v300-review/2
Seq read/write speeds arent even that relevant. Random IOPS and latency will count more in everyday tasks.
The only thing I want off this ssd is for a boot drive, all I want it to do is to speed up my pc a bit because the 8 year old wd blue I have atm isn't cutting much slack anymore