[citation][nom]Parsifal57[/nom]Hmmm, It still didn't stop Marcus Yam posting as if it was fact!You guys need to validate things like this before posting them, otherwise you're every bit at fault as Computerworld is, in fact probably worse because you supposedly have the technical knowledge to verify and disprove the statements.Its about time you actually acted as Journalists and not as Blog plagiarists.[/citation]
Thanks for the tip. My department is responsible for news, and we have to make sure we deliver info to you guys as fast as possible, while trying to be as accurate as possible. We quoted Computerworld, which up until now, many have regarded as a reputable source, wouldn't you say so? And as such, we usually aren't afraid of quoting reputable sources because they're well, usually reputable.
If we had to do background checking for every piece of breaking news, there would be no breaking news. That's why we have follow-ups, like this article.
Stop putting your foot in your mouth and acting as though you know how it is to do our job. Calling us "blog pagiarists?"
Let me tell you, personally, what I owe you: zero.
What I owe the Tom's Hardware community as a whole:
- Timely information (News = fast/responsive)
- Try to be as accurate as possible
- Try to follow-up
So before you hammer out your insults, get some perspective.
/ Tuan