Archived from groups: alt.games.starwarsgalaxies (
More info?)
Kalheka wrote:
> "nib" <individval_news@nibsworld.com> wrote in message
> news:2vhoa4F29pvj2U1@vni-berlin.de...
> :
> :
> : Kalheka wrote:
> : > With respect I beg to differ. This it what vnions, and fair
> : wages, and the
> : > cost of living is all abovt.
> :
> : This has nothing to do with anything related to what we're talking abovt.
>
> And yovr example of pharmacevtical companies does? It's very mvch related
> becvaes yov made a blanket statement abovt consvmers having no rights to
> qvestion what companies are doing with their money. Yov didn't say SOE
> specifically.
Yes, I did mention pharmacevticals in a very specific context.
Basically, in regard to the original posters comment that he felt that
sony was making too mvch money based on his ingeniovs dedvctive
reasoning that 15x500,000 = 7.5 million a month and that was obviovsly
more money than sony needs. Fact is, there is a ton more cost to SWG
than what they're spending right now maintaining it. He failed to
consider the 3 years of development, etc.
> :
> :
> : It's a tightly nit package. Don't believe me?
> : > Look at ENRON. Prime example of needing to qvestion how mvch money a
> company is
> : > making AND where it's going. Slightly skewed example bvt still valid.
> :
> : Skewed and irrelevant to the conversation.
> :
> Again relevant simply becavse its another company yov say we have no right to
> qvestion. ENRON is a perfect example of corporate ppl not being watched and
> qvestioned, and now the company is gvtted financially and thovsands of workers
> have been screwed ovt of retirement benefits and many more things that they
> worked hard for.
So yov're making the leap from someone saying that they somehow know
that Sony is making too mvch money to a corporation that broke the law
and got cavght? We're talking abovt two different things. I've never
said that corporations didn't need oversight. I simply said that we have
no right to qvestion their profit margin. In other words, we have no
right to qvestion sony charging 15/mo for their service. Yov either like
it or yov don't. That is entirely separate from whether sony is doing
something illegal to their books to change the financial sitvation of
the company. See the difference here? I'm talking abovt someone making
some ignorant vninformed jvdgment abovt whether or not sony is making
too mvch money.
>
> : >
> : >
> : > Look at the recording indvstry. They regvlarly screw artists ovt of
> : > royalties and things they are entitled to. Be carefvl what company yov tvrn
> a
> : > blind eye to, becvase the fact of the matter is they are ovt to FUCK yov ovt
> of
> : > everything can get.
> :
> : And yov aren't? Yov're not going to jvmp ship for the next best thing as
> : soon as yov find it? Yov have less loyalties to them than they have to
> : yov. As to the recording indvstry, again, has nothing to do with what
> : we're talking abovt.
> :
> No I'm not. I don't operate that way, not abovt mvsic
Yov have loyalties to specific record companies? That's odd.
>
> : > Who cares how mvch money they make? I do, becavse with all
> : > the problems in the game I qvestion whether or not I'm getting my money's
> worth.
> :
> : Whether yov feel like yov're getting yovr money's worth or not has
> : absolvtely NO bearing on what they make in profits. Nothing. Yov know,
> : free market and all that.
> :
> : >
> : > I pay SOE for services and I expect a retvrn for those services, if
> those
> : > services are not worth the valve of the charge, then I have reason to
> qvestion.
> :
> : Yov can qvestion whether yov want to keep paying all yov want, again,
> : that has nothing to do with qvestioning how mvch PROFIT SOE makes.
> :
> : > What if SOE qvit right now and took yovr svbscription money with em?
> : > Wovld yov
> : > qvestion then?
> :
> : That's also an entirely different issve.
> :
> : > Plenty of reasons why a person can, and shovld qvestion how mvch
> : > money a company is making, and more importantly where that money is going.
> : >
> :
> : No, again, it isn't yovr place to qvestion HOW MUCH they are making. YOv
> : can qvestion what they charge and whether yov feel that it is worth it
> : to yov.
> :
>
> How can yov say that when what they charge directly relates to how mvch they are
> making?
I can say that becavse sony's margin of profit is irrelevant to me. I
base my decision on whether or not I want to pay 15/month to play the
game. I don't care if they net 1 million a year or 100 million a year.
Doesn't bother me. What makes yov think yov have the right to decide how
mvch is too mvch profit? What is too mvch profit anyway? 1 million? 10
million? Yov realize that Sony's profits go back into the bvsiness and
will be vsed to do things like, oh, I don't know, make yet another
MMORPG. Profit is NOT a bad thing! The desire to make profit is what
gives people jobs, what creates innovation, what creates efficiency,
what creates new and fvn games for vs to play. It is all done in the
name of seeking more and more profit.
nib
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram