CPU Charts, An ATI Update, And Zotac's Mini-ITX Board

[cangelini]

All has been quiet from Intel on that front cletus--more as soon as I know it! =)

 

[dhowie]

Two 1156 Mini ITX boards out soon!

Intel H57 1156 Mini ITX
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3648&p=3

DFI P55 1156 Mini ITX
http://www.clunk.org.uk/news-stories/dfi-mi-p55-t36-mini-itx-board-imminent.html

These are far too tempting for me to even ponder the thought of a 775 Mini ITX or a Atom Setup XD

 

[Guest]

cletus: I'd bet you it's not coming out at all, the performance numbers were a lie, and a bad one at that. Larrabee is basically the idea that lumping 20 or 30 Atom CPUs on one die magically gives each core more Gflops than a Nehalem core(or an entire Nehalem quad, for that matter).

1 Nehalem Quad: 70gflops, or 17.5gflops per core
1 32 core Larrabee: 2Tflops or ~60glops per core

Sound unrealistic? It is...

 

[tester24]

[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]BTW, tester, expect to see the 860 on the charts next month![/citation]

You're my hero!

 

[Stardude82]

Arg... no E7XXX, E6XXX, E3XXX CPU's and no Atom, but the now extinct Q6xxx is still on the list. Same thing with the AMD, no Semprons, but the Phenom X4s are stinking up the list.

 

[pletopia]

I noticed this yesterday while taking a look at the CPU charts and today I noticed that it still hasn't been fixed:

if you compare:
AMD Phenom II X3 705e (Heka 3c)
* 2.5 GHz, DDR3-1333, 1.5 MB L2, 6 MB L3
to
AMD Phenom X4 9150e (Agena 4c)
* 1.8 GHz, DDR2-1066, 2MB L2, 2 MB L3

the stats that are inputed into the chart are the exact same values .. somehow i don't think this is possible 😉

 

[cangelini]

[citation][nom]pletopia[/nom]I noticed this yesterday while taking a look at the CPU charts and today I noticed that it still hasn't been fixed:if you compare:AMD Phenom II X3 705e (Heka 3c) * 2.5 GHz, DDR3-1333, 1.5 MB L2, 6 MB L3toAMD Phenom X4 9150e (Agena 4c) * 1.8 GHz, DDR2-1066, 2MB L2, 2 MB L3the stats that are inputed into the chart are the exact same values .. somehow i don't think this is possible[/citation]

Reported this to the charts team and it looks like they've fixed it!

 

[wira020]

I hope to see an exclusive article clearing the facts about cpu's pricing on same model with different clockspeed... i mean, i7 870 is almost double the price of i7 860 just for a few hudnred mHZ speed increase... or phenom II 955 to 965... on AMD cpu it is easily justified with little price increase, but Intel's cpu are just too much to be relevent... i know intel or amd probably wont like the article.. but come on, i miss the day when Toms used to be the source of breaking news and brave foundings.. unravelling stuff that we the consumers cant afford to do on our own... pelase..