I have a general question about CPUs and how they affect gaming performance.
That question is, if a game is using its maximum number of cores, and CPU load does not reach 100%, does that mean that that CPU is not being fully utilized by the game already, and no benefit would come from upgrading it in terms of cores/speeds?
Specifically, I am playing a lot of tribes: ascend at the moment. The game uses 4 threads, and while looking at CPU load for my phenom 9600 at 2.3ghz, the load never exceeds 60, 65%, balanced well over the four cores. It would seem to me that upgrading the CPU would not do anything at all in terms of increasing performance, since the CPU I already have does not appear to be fully utilized as it is.
Am I correct in thinking this, or is there another aspect of the CPU / game performance relationship that Im missing?
That question is, if a game is using its maximum number of cores, and CPU load does not reach 100%, does that mean that that CPU is not being fully utilized by the game already, and no benefit would come from upgrading it in terms of cores/speeds?
Specifically, I am playing a lot of tribes: ascend at the moment. The game uses 4 threads, and while looking at CPU load for my phenom 9600 at 2.3ghz, the load never exceeds 60, 65%, balanced well over the four cores. It would seem to me that upgrading the CPU would not do anything at all in terms of increasing performance, since the CPU I already have does not appear to be fully utilized as it is.
Am I correct in thinking this, or is there another aspect of the CPU / game performance relationship that Im missing?