Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (
More info?)
Tim,
Thanks for taking the time to write this lengthily reply. Just when I
thought all could be saved with DPI. I've solved half of my problem by
buying a clone computer on eBay. It's a Pentium 4 at 3.2G, 512M DRAM with a
160G HD. Doesn't have PCI Express but for $750 delivered it's not a bad
deal. Doesn't have a monitor at that price so it'll replace the 700MHz P3,
HP desktop which is still running a 20" CRT that came with a 486 Gateway.
Monitor is still going strong. Since we're not gamers this should work out.
Plus my wife isn't willing to downsize her monitor.
![Smile :) :)]()
I'm still in the
market for a replacement for my Dell Inspiron 7000 laptop. So it's
replacement will have to have a monitor. I've got a bid in for a Dimension
8400 w/19" LCD monitor. Sweet system but I'll have to wait and see how it
goes.
Paul
"Timothy Drouillard" <timdrouillard@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RPCdndsKv7jKhRjcRVn-3g@comcast.com...
>I have been running 19" CRT's at home for years now. When I was using 17"
>CRT's , I ran them at 1024x768. When I went to the 19", I went to using
>1280x1024.
>
> (BTW, I'm 52)
>
> For a while now, I had been contemplating buying a LCD monitor myself.
> I figured that if I had a 19" screen now, and I was going to spend a good
> amount of money, I should get something larger than what I already had.
>
> Well, as it's been pointed out, LCD's have a 'Native' resolution that they
> look best when used at.
>
> I found that most 17" and 19" LCD's are best run at 1280x1024. But as soon
> as you go past 19" to 20" or larger, They run best at 1600x1200.
>
> Well, for me, 1280x1024 is great, but 1600x1200 makes the text waaaay to
> small when using the default DPI settings. Yes I know you can adjust the
> DPI settings, but because of some of the potential side effects with
> dialog boxes, etc, I didn't want to change the DPI.
>
> Soooo, in my case, I stayed with a 19" at 1280x1024, and its great. In
> addition, a CRT's viewable size will be about 1" less than the advertised
> size, but a LCD viewable size is the same as the advertised size. So, even
> tho I stayed with 19", by LCD screen is actually bigger that the 19" CRT
> it replaced.
>
> Also, LCD monitors don't use as much electricity as a CRT, and most
> important, thaey take up much less desk space.
>
>
> But.......
>
> Keep in mind that the monitor you buy, no matter what type, is something
> you will be looking at for years. Most monitors will outlive 2-4
> generations of PC's. In other words, you will probably go through 2 to 4
> PC's before it's time to buy a new monitor.
>
> A bad monitor can cause severe eyestrain. Do NOT cut corners budget-wise
> when it come to your monitor.
>
> Now, along with that, as it's been pointed out, it's best if you can find
> a local store that you can visit to actually seen the monitors on display.
> It's just like picking out a TV. Find one that looks good to YOU, then
> look at the specs and the price.
>
> A problem that you might run into tho, is the resolution the monitors are
> running at, at the store. Most stores will use a video splitter to feed
> the same video to multiple monitors to help with comparisions.
> That's good.
> However, that means that all the monitors are running at the same
> resolution, typically 1024x768 because it's a common resolution that most
> monitors can run at.
> That could be bad, because it means that the LCD monitors that are made to
> run at 1280x1024 or better, aren't being displayed at their native
> resolution.
>
> Bottom line, as stated by others, go to a store somewhere and look at the
> monitors running at a resoultion that looks good to you, and find one that
> is easy on YOUR eyes, then pick one.
>
>
> "Dave" <dm@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
65hd.32122$JS4.2125@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> In article <0i19o093iujn3lnp2gqgtbip7ovul9nvnj@4ax.com>, Paul Knudsen
>> <HughG@dodgeit.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:53:32 -0400, "Paul Schilter"
>>><paulschilter@comcast,dot,net> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>So in your humble opinion, would an LCD monitor be
>>>>advisable? I wasn't sure if I remember someone saying that the text and
>>>>images aren't as clear on an LCD when run at low resolution as they are
>>>>on a
>>>>CRT monitor. Your thoughts please.
>>
>>>If possible, go to the store and check them out first, but a 17"
>>>should be really sweet. I want one too!
>>
>>
>> Yes, LCD's have a "native" resolution mode. For a 17", it is
>> (always?) 1280x1024. When you run them at a different res, they
>> interpolate and scale and clearly doesn't look as good. My dad's
>> SO runs a 17" at 800x600 (I believe) and I find it unpleasant, but
>> she seems happy with it. So best bet is to check it out in a shop
>> and have them change the resolution for you.
>
>