I bought crysis thinking it would be an awsome shooter that would be very fun and improve on Far cry in every way. For the most part, I was right.
I even upgraded my video card to an 8800gt because I wanted to see the game at its best. I was not disappointed. With my C2D 6400 and 8800gt the game runs flawlessly at 1280 x 1024 with all details highest (DX9, except no anialiasing)
The graphics are indeed astonishing. I remember being in a firefight along a rocky stream when I spotted 3 dead bodies floating down the stream. Oh, the grass as the sunlight hit it, and the water floating along the perfect rocks... Bang! I was shot and killed. Forgot all about the firefight!
I have no idea how Crysis could miss the game of the year award. There is nothing else even close (IMO). Call of Duty 4 was good, but its short, intense missions left the whole thing a little too scripted in my opinion. I have not played gears of war, though. I am shocked that so many people seem to dislike crysis. The nano suit options added enough to the gameplay to give you a unique experience for a shooter. The only dissapointment is the stupid vehicles. They are impossible to drive.
I must say though, that if you don't have a graphics card that is an 8800 variant, or one of ATI's new cards, I can see why crysis would be disappointing. Before I upgraded, my 7950gt could play at medium, but it wasn't quite the same experience.
Hellgate london is indeed a piece of trash. If you play the game for 15 minutes, you have seen all there is to see. The same monsters, the same enviroments (like 4 basic environments, 3 room types per environment), and amazingly crappy skill trees make that game incredibly stale.