This is whole CTS labs and AMD vulnerability thing has left me with a very sour taste in my mouth. That is not because of the flaws but because of how many big tech report sites, including Toms, put this information in their articles.
The whole way in how CTS labs presented this and the limited content given should have raised so many red flags that Toms should have done some research first and added their suspicions to the first news post. Now this second news post with the response from CTS labs is not making this any better.
While I think it's OK for Toms to post the CTS response Tom should again make clear that the response is still not even close to enough to make the suspicions any less.
The CTS reponse is again total crap and should raise more red flags:
CTS says they discussed with other security firms and that led them to believe that AMD could not fix these vulnerabilities in 90 days so they gave them 24 hours.
Wait what??? If anyone is able to give them an estimate it would be AMD not other security firms. Also there are 13 vulnerabilities, maybe AMD could have fixed a few in 90 days, that would still have helped. And come on, 24 hours for AMD, they can barely investigate the flaws in that time, let alone give a good response.
So no, the CTS response does not give them any more credibility and still makes them bad people with a double agenda. Their approach is just bad and stays bad.
So Toms, I hope you learn from this bad journalism, as this is below standard!
The whole way in how CTS labs presented this and the limited content given should have raised so many red flags that Toms should have done some research first and added their suspicions to the first news post. Now this second news post with the response from CTS labs is not making this any better.
While I think it's OK for Toms to post the CTS response Tom should again make clear that the response is still not even close to enough to make the suspicions any less.
The CTS reponse is again total crap and should raise more red flags:
CTS says they discussed with other security firms and that led them to believe that AMD could not fix these vulnerabilities in 90 days so they gave them 24 hours.
Wait what??? If anyone is able to give them an estimate it would be AMD not other security firms. Also there are 13 vulnerabilities, maybe AMD could have fixed a few in 90 days, that would still have helped. And come on, 24 hours for AMD, they can barely investigate the flaws in that time, let alone give a good response.
So no, the CTS response does not give them any more credibility and still makes them bad people with a double agenda. Their approach is just bad and stays bad.
So Toms, I hope you learn from this bad journalism, as this is below standard!