Question Dilemma between two cpus for playing WoW, Amd vs Intel

Haysmt228

Distinguished
Jul 17, 2017
37
0
18,530
Hello all,

I am currently building a new pc that will be incredibly better than my current desktop. During the process of my over analyzing, I came to a split path between two CPUs. I've used Benchmark websites to try to simplify my choice by defaulting to what is considered best high-end performance, however my newest struggle is the fact that one CPU is ranked higher overall but is more focused on multithread and the other is not super far behind overall but excels much better at single thread.

I have heard rumors that a CPU that performs great on single thread is best for WoW. However, since it's been so long since I've built a computer times might have changed. Please help and enlighten me on what would be a better choice. Below I have listed out the names of not only the two CPUs but also the remainder of the build:

Cpu1 - AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (this one has a higher rank high end performance but comparing single thread rank, it is like 50th ish)
CPU2 - Intel i9 14900K (this one was a few ranks below the and however it was like number 6th on single thread)

GPU - Nvidia RTX 4070 Super (may do the Ti super)

Ram 32gb DDR5

Mobo: MSI B650-P/Pro Z790(depending on cpu choice)

Thank you again for the help and sorry I'm long winded and incredible uncertain.
 
Last edited:

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
wow will run on a potato as they say. meaning it takes very little cpu to run it.

anything top end is overkill and will run it very well.

considering the issues intel is having with the new cpu's, i'd go with the AMD chip until they get it worked out. just my opinion. either way, you are looking at a lot more cpy than is needed by far :)
 

Haysmt228

Distinguished
Jul 17, 2017
37
0
18,530
wow will run on a potato as they say. meaning it takes very little cpu to run it.

anything top end is overkill and will run it very well.

considering the issues intel is having with the new cpu's, i'd go with the AMD chip until they get it worked out. just my opinion. either way, you are looking at a lot more cpy than is needed by far :)
I have heard before that any of the options I had were overkill. I guess I see it as wanting to ensure no issues and future proof best I can. So "until they get it worked out" could mean seven years cause my current pc lasted that long and I hope next one does too. Or ish.
 

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
right. so far intel has not issued any recalls or any ideas on how to prevent the cpu from eating itself. so to play it safe i would personally avoid them. so if you're buying now and intend to hold onto the system for a long time, i'd go with the AMD and know it'll be a solid cpu for a long time to come.

i'm on a 5900x myself and figure i won't need an upgrade for a number of years myself. i'm more likely to upgrade the gpu or add more ram before changing to a newer gen cpu/mobo combo
 

Haysmt228

Distinguished
Jul 17, 2017
37
0
18,530
right. so far intel has not issued any recalls or any ideas on how to prevent the cpu from eating itself. so to play it safe i would personally avoid them. so if you're buying now and intend to hold onto the system for a long time, i'd go with the AMD and know it'll be a solid cpu for a long time to come.

i'm on a 5900x myself and figure i won't need an upgrade for a number of years myself. i'm more likely to upgrade the gpu or add more ram before changing to a newer gen cpu/mobo combo
Thank you for all this. I was set on the amd, despite always buying and being loyal to Intel... Then when Google was like single thread is best for wow and the Intel one is barely below amd overall but is way better than it, ranking wise, than the Amd for single thread, I was like crap now I'm back to square one of overthinking.
 

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
we've all been there :)

overall all those benchmark numbers are just something for people to argue over. in the end you won't know the difference of which cpu is in the system.

kind of like arguing about super cars. this one has a higher top speed, this one has better 0-60, this one did 2 secs faster on the track and so on and so on. but in the end if you had ANY of those cars, you'd have a smile from ear to ear every time you got behind the wheel. those tenths of a sec here and there are meaningless when you actually get to drive it. !!

we can just actually afford to buy one of these cpu's so we tend to overthink all the data since its a real purchase we're gonna make. :unsure:

i'm a bang for the buck buyer. i go back and forth depending on what gives me the most for my cash. i'm not swayed by marketing hype for the latest/greatest acronym feature. they rarely make a difference in my computing world. right now AMD has the best bang for the buck for me. cheaper, less power hungry and that means i can spend more on extra ram, more gpu, more storage etc etc etc.

i've never once installed a piece of software and had it tell me "if you had an intel/amd cpu you'd get this extra feature!"
 

Haysmt228

Distinguished
Jul 17, 2017
37
0
18,530
we've all been there :)

overall all those benchmark numbers are just something for people to argue over. in the end you won't know the difference of which cpu is in the system.

kind of like arguing about super cars. this one has a higher top speed, this one has better 0-60, this one did 2 secs faster on the track and so on and so on. but in the end if you had ANY of those cars, you'd have a smile from ear to ear every time you got behind the wheel. those tenths of a sec here and there are meaningless when you actually get to drive it. !!

we can just actually afford to buy one of these cpu's so we tend to overthink all the data since its a real purchase we're gonna make. :unsure:

i'm a bang for the buck buyer. i go back and forth depending on what gives me the most for my cash. i'm not swayed by marketing hype for the latest/greatest acronym feature. they rarely make a difference in my computing world. right now AMD has the best bang for the buck for me. cheaper, less power hungry and that means i can spend more on extra ram, more gpu, more storage etc etc etc
Hahaha your analogy actually was very solid. I'm the nerd who Sims his characters and considered a single grain of rice will tip the scale... My friend said that any option I had was overkill esp these two cpus. He said that amd has come a long way and tends to out perform Intel more over than not... But then reminded me I'm overthinking on a 20 year old game lol.
 

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
i'm not a player myself but i think there are a ton of mods that can actually ramp up the system requirements. however, if i recall right, they are mostly stuff like 4k textures and such that can tax a gpu more and more. i don't think i've seen anything about a mod that needs more cpu power. but then again as i say i am not an actual player of the game. i just read a lot :)

so maybe if you try really hard you can mod the heck out of it and force a NEED for the high end cpu, ;)