Does AMD has some future?

[ground_guru]

1.) Blu-Ray is not antiquated...it is now what DVD was 10 years ago. I also believe you reference NetFlix, which is having their own problems. Not aware of any "NextFlex", but you can buy Sony stock currently, since they hold the patent to Blu-Ray, you may even make money on that "iffy gamble".

BluRay is dead and replaced with Streaming and Cloud Service. No reason to buy a disc today, Block Buster and Video rental stores are relics like record stores. No reason to buy movies or software today on CD/DVD/Blu-Ray because you can download or stream all of it from home.

2.) Good thing companies like Barnes & Noble are going the Amazon route...their stock is not what it once was, but far from a penny stock.

Around yes, relevant no.

3.) Ma Bell = AT&T, they are still around too...

How old are you? Bell and ATT were broke up in 1982 33 years ago. The 7 Baby bells are Land Line twisted copper aka POTS which has been dead for years and replaced by VOIP and Wireless which are carried by CATV and ATT, Verizon and other wireless/internet providers. I work in telecom for 35 years. I was laid off from Southwestern Bell in 1985. Bell switching and head quarter offices are ghost towns. Twisted copper is DEAD. The 7 Baby Bells missed their opportunity in the late 90's and early 2000's when they failed to implement FIOS to the home. All that dark fiber is now being snatched up by GOOGLE and ATT. Fact is ATT and Bell have no ties and are estranged siblings, Judge Green broke up that monopoly 33 years ago. .

4.) Also, most cable companies offer comparable speeds to Google Fiber for less money now. Unless you live in BFE.

How is 50 mb/s CATV comparable to 1 gb/s Ethernet from Google and ATT?

Although completly irrelevant to this thread i agree with you 100%.

Sorry got side tracked when someone attacked me stating AMD core business model is dead because they were not able to keep up with the technology. I used some analogies of dead businesses like Kodak, Nortel, Xerox, Memorex, etc... Apparently some one did not like me saying if you own AMD stock to liquidate your position before you get caught holding the bag. I can only assume they own and use AMD.

 

[jdwii]

Ah i guess i messed that part then i find it relevant

 

[bmacsys]

AMD has a future - http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-amd-win-win-acquisition,28403.html#xtor=EPR-8886

The part reporting the troubles of AMD and the lack of future is precise.

The part reporting why Samsung would buy AMD is difficult to accept.

AMD's experience doing CPUs means nothing. Looks at Apple and Nvidia, without the same experience both have first class CPUs in their market, whereas AMD better design in the same market (Jaguar/Puma) is not competitive. If Samsung want to do a CPU they only need to hire a group of good engineers (like Apple and Nvidia did) instead purchasing an entire company with debts like AMD.

The same about GPUs. Samsung only needs to hire engineers. In fact this is what Samsung did. Samsung GPU is expected to arrive this year. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Samsung canceled its server plans. And the last partner to chose would be AMD. AMD has the record of losing the x86 server market and now are losing the ARM server market as well: people is purchasing APM and Cavium real products and avoiding AMD's Seattle hype. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Why would Samsung want a x86 license (even assuming it is transferable/purchasable) when x86 has no future?

Can I ask you a question? What is the purpose of this thread? Not to mention the other thread. Lots of tech companies that were once mighty are dead or dying. SGI, Novell, SUN, XEROX, H.P. Wang. The list is huge All you do is bash AMD. You say the same thing over and over. What will you do if they die? Will you go away? Does it make you feel smart? Like you could run AMD better than the people in charge there? This thread should be locked due to the premise that there is nothing constructive about it at all. It has not one redeeming quality.

For one if you don't feel the need to have a thread that can talk about future products from a company then perhaps you should get off of it.

For example people like to talk about the future of some sport team however no one really questions why this is happening.

Some people look at businesses as a sport and yes those companies matter to that you mentioned and i guess there is people who are more knowledgeable to discuses those areas are at some other forum. BUT this forum is to discuses Amd's future and this forum was made when the other one closes.

Obviously people want to talk about it if its here and even you since you clicked on it unless you were trying to put down others for reading it.

Edit

Also if you feel someone is bashing a certain company when all they are doing is providing evidence then possibly you have a bias yourself. For example if you read a gtx 970 review and think for even a second a 290X is better in terms of performance per watt in gaming you would be mistaken and possibly bias.

It's like getting mad at reviewers for telling their audience how it is if you don't like it then fine but others like to read about the information.

I'm not trying to put down people for reading the thread. I am saying the original poster is obviously just trolling for anything negative about AMD. It is very transparent. He wants people to agree with him to inflate his ego. I started reading the thread. But it soon became pretty obvious that NOTHING AMD does is any good. GPU's, CPU's, IGPU's. Old management, new management. They aren't worth being bought out. They have no worthwhile intellectual property. No one would invest in them. Hundreds of posts about the same exact thing. If they are that bad why even post about them? I am calling him out and I could give a rats behind what you think.

 

[bmacsys]

You can say that about the baby bells, but it seems to me when I was in college, they were talking about the breakup, and how that ATT and various others were actually buying back up the companies, thus starting to effectively reconstitute the old monopolies.

To some extent yes, bu tonly litle peices of the money makers Bell had to sell of to remain a float.

Example all 7 Baby Bells use to have cellular, no more they sold that to ATT. Bell also use to have carriers (fiber and microwave radio between cities for long distance, internet, ect.... ATT bought that up along with all the fiber optic routes. All the baby Bells have left is the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and twisted copper to the public and associated DSL. The PSTN and DSL market is dying. Who wants a twisted copper line today with dial tone and DSL? No one.

Remember Nortel aka Northern Telecom? They were the largest switch manufacture and a huge company. They do not exist, gone in 2005. Nortel switching went to Erricson, and the cellular CDMA/LTE/4G went to Lucent. The rest was divided up and sold in chunks. PSTN is a dead technology giving way to VOIP. LTE/4G is wireless VOIP. Even CDMA and GSM networks will be gone soon like Analog cellular because they are a PSTN technology. The Baby Bells are 8-Track tapes.

Too bad they didn't stay broken up. Verizon and ATT are way too big and dominant. I worked at Southern New England Telephone from 1983 when I got out of the USMC till I was bought out around 2000. So many guys took the buyout many of us came back because they had no installation guys. Now I work in broadband for Frontier.

 

[jdwii]

AMD has a future - http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-amd-win-win-acquisition,28403.html#xtor=EPR-8886

The part reporting the troubles of AMD and the lack of future is precise.

The part reporting why Samsung would buy AMD is difficult to accept.

AMD's experience doing CPUs means nothing. Looks at Apple and Nvidia, without the same experience both have first class CPUs in their market, whereas AMD better design in the same market (Jaguar/Puma) is not competitive. If Samsung want to do a CPU they only need to hire a group of good engineers (like Apple and Nvidia did) instead purchasing an entire company with debts like AMD.

The same about GPUs. Samsung only needs to hire engineers. In fact this is what Samsung did. Samsung GPU is expected to arrive this year. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Samsung canceled its server plans. And the last partner to chose would be AMD. AMD has the record of losing the x86 server market and now are losing the ARM server market as well: people is purchasing APM and Cavium real products and avoiding AMD's Seattle hype. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Why would Samsung want a x86 license (even assuming it is transferable/purchasable) when x86 has no future?

Can I ask you a question? What is the purpose of this thread? Not to mention the other thread. Lots of tech companies that were once mighty are dead or dying. SGI, Novell, SUN, XEROX, H.P. Wang. The list is huge All you do is bash AMD. You say the same thing over and over. What will you do if they die? Will you go away? Does it make you feel smart? Like you could run AMD better than the people in charge there? This thread should be locked due to the premise that there is nothing constructive about it at all. It has not one redeeming quality.

For one if you don't feel the need to have a thread that can talk about future products from a company then perhaps you should get off of it.

For example people like to talk about the future of some sport team however no one really questions why this is happening.

Some people look at businesses as a sport and yes those companies matter to that you mentioned and i guess there is people who are more knowledgeable to discuses those areas are at some other forum. BUT this forum is to discuses Amd's future and this forum was made when the other one closes.

Obviously people want to talk about it if its here and even you since you clicked on it unless you were trying to put down others for reading it.

Edit

Also if you feel someone is bashing a certain company when all they are doing is providing evidence then possibly you have a bias yourself. For example if you read a gtx 970 review and think for even a second a 290X is better in terms of performance per watt in gaming you would be mistaken and possibly bias.

It's like getting mad at reviewers for telling their audience how it is if you don't like it then fine but others like to read about the information.

I'm not trying to put down people for reading the thread. I am saying the original poster is obviously just trolling for anything negative about AMD. It is very transparent. He wants people to agree with him to inflate his ego. I started reading the thread. But it soon became pretty obvious that NOTHING AMD does is any good. GPU's, CPU's, IGPU's. Old management, new management. They aren't worth being bought out. They have no worthwhile intellectual property. No one would invest in them. Hundreds of posts about the same exact thing. If they are that bad why even post about them? I am calling him out and I could give a rats behind what you think.

Then perhaps we can get some mods to come in and see what they think about your comments i'm guessing they wouldn't care for them since they generally don't like people calling other users out and then claiming they don't care what a certain user thinks when they do it.

As for the comments about everything Amd is doing is bad well at the moment they are behind in every area(besides the igpu something juan never put down). And they are being quiet and so on the need to call them out is needed.

For example do you want the news to just stop posting bad things to make you happy?

 

[etayorius]

AMD has a future - http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-amd-win-win-acquisition,28403.html#xtor=EPR-8886

The part reporting the troubles of AMD and the lack of future is precise.

The part reporting why Samsung would buy AMD is difficult to accept.

AMD's experience doing CPUs means nothing. Looks at Apple and Nvidia, without the same experience both have first class CPUs in their market, whereas AMD better design in the same market (Jaguar/Puma) is not competitive. If Samsung want to do a CPU they only need to hire a group of good engineers (like Apple and Nvidia did) instead purchasing an entire company with debts like AMD.

The same about GPUs. Samsung only needs to hire engineers. In fact this is what Samsung did. Samsung GPU is expected to arrive this year. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Samsung canceled its server plans. And the last partner to chose would be AMD. AMD has the record of losing the x86 server market and now are losing the ARM server market as well: people is purchasing APM and Cavium real products and avoiding AMD's Seattle hype. Again AMD is irrelevant.

Why would Samsung want a x86 license (even assuming it is transferable/purchasable) when x86 has no future?

Can I ask you a question? What is the purpose of this thread? Not to mention the other thread. Lots of tech companies that were once mighty are dead or dying. SGI, Novell, SUN, XEROX, H.P. Wang. The list is huge All you do is bash AMD. You say the same thing over and over. What will you do if they die? Will you go away? Does it make you feel smart? Like you could run AMD better than the people in charge there? This thread should be locked due to the premise that there is nothing constructive about it at all. It has not one redeeming quality.

For one if you don't feel the need to have a thread that can talk about future products from a company then perhaps you should get off of it.

For example people like to talk about the future of some sport team however no one really questions why this is happening.

Some people look at businesses as a sport and yes those companies matter to that you mentioned and i guess there is people who are more knowledgeable to discuses those areas are at some other forum. BUT this forum is to discuses Amd's future and this forum was made when the other one closes.

Obviously people want to talk about it if its here and even you since you clicked on it unless you were trying to put down others for reading it.

Edit

Also if you feel someone is bashing a certain company when all they are doing is providing evidence then possibly you have a bias yourself. For example if you read a gtx 970 review and think for even a second a 290X is better in terms of performance per watt in gaming you would be mistaken and possibly bias.

It's like getting mad at reviewers for telling their audience how it is if you don't like it then fine but others like to read about the information.

I'm not trying to put down people for reading the thread. I am saying the original poster is obviously just trolling for anything negative about AMD. It is very transparent. He wants people to agree with him to inflate his ego. I started reading the thread. But it soon became pretty obvious that NOTHING AMD does is any good. GPU's, CPU's, IGPU's. Old management, new management. They aren't worth being bought out. They have no worthwhile intellectual property. No one would invest in them. Hundreds of posts about the same exact thing. If they are that bad why even post about them? I am calling him out and I could give a rats behind what you think.

Then perhaps we can get some mods to come in and see what they think about your comments i'm guessing they wouldn't care for them since they generally don't like people calling other users out and then claiming they don't care what a certain user thinks when they do it.

As for the comments about everything Amd is doing is bad well at the moment they are behind in every area(besides the igpu something juan never put down). And they are being quiet and so on the need to call them out is needed.

For example do you want the news to just stop posting bad things to make you happy?

+1

 

[juanrga]

I'm not trying to put down people for reading the thread.

You are

This thread should be locked due to the premise that there is nothing constructive about it at all.

And you are fighting people who disagrees with you.

 

[juanrga]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

 

[ground_guru]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

 

[gonf]

Hi. All. This is just a though after reading the title.

Let me start from what I want to see in the future in the pc world.
A list of stuff I want to see.
-a tablet pc that let me install os of my choice
-8 hrs + batteries life. "gaming 3-4 hrs"
-can play games "all steam game without lag" it doesn't have to be max res but playable setting.
-water proof.
-less than 1.5lb without dock station
-it have a dock station that have some HDD space in it
-under 699 USD. Same price of apple an Ipad 128Gb with sim card. Which is the most people will pay for a tablet.
-option of 11" to 21" screen. It doesn't have to be 4k but 1080hd.

I can only see AMD doing something like this with their future apu.
I know Intel is more powerful than AMD but asking Intel to work with Nadia to build a chip? Good luck with that.
And Intel itself can't do game that well. "I could be wrong caz I never had a pc that without a video card."

Is AMD working their way to something like this? I hope so.
AMD is working on lower wattage CPU/apu? Yes
Will AMD apu be able play steam most game today without lag? It getting there.
Less than 1.5lb if Sony and apple can do less than 1 I don't see why not.
Water proof = fanless apu = low wattage? It getting there.

Am I the only one here who want this? I hope not.
So does AMD has some future? I hope so. Caz they are the only one out there who will can do this.

AMD today.
I can see why they are losing the war here. They haven't deliver a true APU. One that can truly replace the CPU gpu combo.
Their CPU is not as good as intel "what most people think".
Their video card supports used to suck. Once trust is lost it hard to restore even tho I hear they are improving.

Which all this = lost of money.

The things that are keeping AMD alive.
Game platform.
Yes the ps4, Xbox, and Wii u. No matter which one you buy. You will end up helping AMD.

Things that maybe helping AMD now and the future.
The Game platform.
Yes if game programmer are using AMD design codes to do ps4 and Xbox to harness the full AMD design chip power. Will that have a impact on the pc world?

 

[gamerk316]

Who wants a twisted copper line today with dial tone and DSL? No one.

Me, actually. And a lot of powerful people here in New York. Why? Because we like 911 working when power goes out. That's why NY is forcing ATT/Verizon to fix their old phone networks post Sandy.

 

[gamerk316]

You can say that about the baby bells, but it seems to me when I was in college, they were talking about the breakup, and how that ATT and various others were actually buying back up the companies, thus starting to effectively reconstitute the old monopolies.

To some extent yes, bu tonly litle peices of the money makers Bell had to sell of to remain a float.

Example all 7 Baby Bells use to have cellular, no more they sold that to ATT. Bell also use to have carriers (fiber and microwave radio between cities for long distance, internet, ect.... ATT bought that up along with all the fiber optic routes. All the baby Bells have left is the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and twisted copper to the public and associated DSL. The PSTN and DSL market is dying. Who wants a twisted copper line today with dial tone and DSL? No one.

Remember Nortel aka Northern Telecom? They were the largest switch manufacture and a huge company. They do not exist, gone in 2005. Nortel switching went to Erricson, and the cellular CDMA/LTE/4G went to Lucent. The rest was divided up and sold in chunks. PSTN is a dead technology giving way to VOIP. LTE/4G is wireless VOIP. Even CDMA and GSM networks will be gone soon like Analog cellular because they are a PSTN technology. The Baby Bells are 8-Track tapes.

Too bad they didn't stay broken up. Verizon and ATT are way too big and dominant. I worked at Southern New England Telephone from 1983 when I got out of the USMC till I was bought out around 2000. So many guys took the buyout many of us came back because they had no installation guys. Now I work in broadband for Frontier.

What happened to the TelCo's is simple: You got a ton of low-cost options, they started price wars to try and gain customers, which eventually drove all of them into bankruptcy. The dominant players then brought all the pieces back up again. The ATT breakup basically gave us ATT + Verizon. All the other pieces have long since been acquired.

Same thing happened in the Airline industry: The low cost carriers competed themselves into bankrupcy, and we gained Southwest out of the deal.

In both cases: Costs to consumers ended up higher then they were before the breakup occurred in the first place.

 

[ground_guru]

In both cases: Costs to consumers ended up higher then they were before the breakup occurred in the first place.

That is not true at all. Back in the days of twisted pair POTS you had to pay for Long Distance Calls. Back in the 80's and 90's nothing unusual having $200 to $300/month phone bill. Today with VOIP $30/month flat rate with all the unlimited Long Distance you want..

I am lucky I have FIOS which provides Phone, 100 mb/s internet,, and CATV for $108/month with all taxes and charges included. Even have WiFi modem included so no wires to puters and cell phones. Phone has E-911 Phase-II which means if I dial 911 My GPS coordinates and address pop-up on the Dispatchers screen.

 

[juanrga]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

Not going to happen, take it over to the trading forums where the shorts are crying the blues today.

He is right! AMD downgraded from hold to SELL

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13019256/1/advanced-micro-devices-amd-downgraded-from-hold-to-sell.html

 

[juanrga]

And more...

It's really starting to look bad for AMD, and that can only be said so many times before you have to ask if this company can survive.

http://www.itworld.com/article/2873965/after-another-disappointing-quarter-whats-left-for-amd.html

 

[juanrga]

right back at you
AMD Increases High Performance CPU R&D Investments
http://wccftech.com/amd-earnings-call/

An advice: I wouldn't mix what LIsa Su said with what WCCFTECH says.

 

[jdwii]

http://postimg.org/image/3wfezjh7t

 

[gamerk316]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

Not going to happen, take it over to the trading forums where the shorts are crying the blues today.

He is right! AMD downgraded from hold to SELL

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13019256/1/advanced-micro-devices-amd-downgraded-from-hold-to-sell.html

You both a crazy.Thu, Jan 22, 2015, 2:45pm EST -Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD) reported Q4 results inline with expectations Tuesday and the stock surged 9.38 percent Wednesday to $2.45.

Ascendiant Capital Markets - Buy
FBR & Co. - Market Perform
Credit Suisse - Underperform
Morgan Stanley - Underweight
Jefferies - Buy
Deutsche Bank- hold
Nomura- neutral

The market had already factored in the earnings report before announcement. Kep babbling juan your ignorance is on full display.

All the more reason to sell now. The stock is likely as high as it is going to be until they release new architectures in the 2016 timeframe. So a 9% bump is plenty of reason to sell. Not that hard to comprehend.

 

[juanrga]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

Not going to happen, take it over to the trading forums where the shorts are crying the blues today.

He is right! AMD downgraded from hold to SELL

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13019256/1/advanced-micro-devices-amd-downgraded-from-hold-to-sell.html

You both a crazy.Thu, Jan 22, 2015, 2:45pm EST -Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD) reported Q4 results inline with expectations Tuesday and the stock surged 9.38 percent Wednesday to $2.45.

Ascendiant Capital Markets - Buy
FBR & Co. - Market Perform
Credit Suisse - Underperform
Morgan Stanley - Underweight
Jefferies - Buy
Deutsche Bank- hold
Nomura- neutral

The market had already factored in the earnings report before announcement. Kep babbling juan your ignorance is on full display.

All the more reason to sell now. The stock is likely as high as it is going to be until they release new architectures in the 2016 timeframe. So a 9% bump is plenty of reason to sell. Not that hard to comprehend.

When it was shown that Carrizo is not the "real game changer" that some expect, and AMD numbers continue to fall, stock will fall again.

 

[juanrga]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

Not going to happen, take it over to the trading forums where the shorts are crying the blues today.

He is right! AMD downgraded from hold to SELL

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13019256/1/advanced-micro-devices-amd-downgraded-from-hold-to-sell.html

You both a crazy.Thu, Jan 22, 2015, 2:45pm EST -Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD) reported Q4 results inline with expectations Tuesday and the stock surged 9.38 percent Wednesday to $2.45.

Ascendiant Capital Markets - Buy
FBR & Co. - Market Perform
Credit Suisse - Underperform
Morgan Stanley - Underweight
Jefferies - Buy
Deutsche Bank- hold
Nomura- neutral

The market had already factored in the earnings report before announcement. Kep babbling juan your ignorance is on full display.

All the more reason to sell now. The stock is likely as high as it is going to be until they release new architectures in the 2016 timeframe. So a 9% bump is plenty of reason to sell. Not that hard to comprehend.

Your saying the stock is as high as it is likely to go, so you should sell now.Makes no sense. At the very least one should hold. Glad to see the market does not listen to people like you and juans crystal ball. If you would have said sell on a dead cat bounce at the very least it would show me you have some grasp on how markets work and there fundamentals. So NO you do not comprehend , If anything one should sell INTEL , Intel is being downgraded also ,there bleeding money, foundries are running at low capacity, there whole product line is bloated and overpriced. Stock price is very close to it's 52 wk high meaning no upside in the short term. other than dividends.

What he said makes lots of sense.

What doesn't make sense is your pretension AMD --> Intel.

 

[gamerk316]

Meanwhile at AMD...

http://ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2008997

All divisions lost revenue summing up to 22% lost since last year. Net loss of $364 million and total debt of $2.21 billion.

And the expectations for 2105 are not better. For Q1 2015, AMD expects revenue to decrease another 15%. This will translate into more personnel cuts, more cuts on R&D, more canceled/delayed projects,...

Liquidate immediately and let another Sucker hold the bag. You don't have to be a Broker to figure that one out. AMD is toast.

Not going to happen, take it over to the trading forums where the shorts are crying the blues today.

He is right! AMD downgraded from hold to SELL

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13019256/1/advanced-micro-devices-amd-downgraded-from-hold-to-sell.html

You both a crazy.Thu, Jan 22, 2015, 2:45pm EST -Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD) reported Q4 results inline with expectations Tuesday and the stock surged 9.38 percent Wednesday to $2.45.

Ascendiant Capital Markets - Buy
FBR & Co. - Market Perform
Credit Suisse - Underperform
Morgan Stanley - Underweight
Jefferies - Buy
Deutsche Bank- hold
Nomura- neutral

The market had already factored in the earnings report before announcement. Kep babbling juan your ignorance is on full display.

All the more reason to sell now. The stock is likely as high as it is going to be until they release new architectures in the 2016 timeframe. So a 9% bump is plenty of reason to sell. Not that hard to comprehend.

Your saying the stock is as high as it is likely to go, so you should sell now.Makes no sense. At the very least one should hold. Glad to see the market does not listen to people like you and juans crystal ball. If you would have said sell on a dead cat bounce at the very least it would show me you have some grasp on how markets work and there fundamentals. So NO you do not comprehend , If anything one should sell INTEL , Intel is being downgraded also ,there bleeding money, foundries are running at low capacity, there whole product line is bloated and overpriced. Stock price is very close to it's 52 wk high meaning no upside in the short term. other than dividends.

So wait, you are saying NOT to sell despite the fact the stock won't get anymore expensive?

Wut?

Then again, considering I made 4/1 last time I brought AMD, I guess I'm clueless. I laughed when some people here started buying them up at $4/share (you know who you are).

You buy stock when you expect the stock to go up in price, You sell it when you expect the stock to go down in price. It's that simple. Holding a stock you expect to decline in price is idiotic.

 

[-Fran-]

NO buying on speculation instead of facts is idiotic. AMD lost ,81% of its stock value today, intel lost 1.26 % today, more important is how intel lost that %, there is little support for intel at its current price
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=INTC+Interactive#%7B%22scale%22%3A%22linear%22%7D

see the nice line going down now look at amd.going sideways
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=AMD+Interactive#

there is support for amd at its current price which is clear indication of bottoming out why would any sane person sell at the bottom ?

glad to hear you made money but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Uhm... The stock market is 100% speculation. There's no "fact checking" only "fact reacting". If you're good at following trends you can actually speculate and make money.

You're going way off the tracks, tourist. I may not agree with gamerk on the current "sell/buy" status of AMD, but he's right about the way of handling the market.

Cheers!

 

[juanrga]

Since tourist ask for facts, here go some:

AMD has spoken repeatedly about preserving its research and development budget, and cutting elsewhere when it announced cuts. The facts do not bear this out. In Q3, AMD's R&D budget was $278m, in Q4 $238m. When looking at the cost reduction AMD enjoyed in Q4, this is a very large proportion of that. By contrast, administration costs only went from $150m to $144m. The way AMD portrayed this, you would have thought the proportions were reversed. This is of great concern not only because of the implications for future development, but also because it makes one question the veracity of AMD's management team.

 

[jdwii]

Man when will they get a good management team? Its like they always had decent engineers but they had to deal with spotty management. I'm not sure this has changed since 2003.

 

[juanrga]

Man when will they get a good management team? Its like they always had decent engineers but they had to deal with spotty management. I'm not sure this has changed since 2003.

The engineers behind Bulldozer was not decent and fired. The x86 engineers were completely wrong regarding ARM and are the reason AMD is late to the party...