Lack of a window in the case does not mean the case is TEMPEST resistant.
I don't know what you mean when you say, ..."tempest resistant."
A window in a computer case means it would never be tempest approved. Only electrically conductive metal can block electromagnetic radiation emanations, shunting them to ground. Glass/plexiglass are electrical insulators not conductors. The radomes of a Lockheed P-3C update II were made of Fiberglas & resin. Yes the electromagnetic energy passed right through it, or it wouldn't have been a very effective RADAR system. All a tempest program actually does is shunt electromagnetic energy to a dedicated earth ground. Your I/O shield is tempest inspired, ever notice how all the external ports on a MB have little spring loaded tangs that press against the I/O shield? How about around the edges of the side panels of a case, with their spring loaded tangs. Did you ever ask yourself why older cases with 5.25" or 3.5" bays have those steel knockouts in place, that you have to spin back and forth to cause metal fatigue so they pop out? That's right "Tempest Inspired!
That's why my very best case ever, as related to tempest security, is a Supermicro SC750-A, because it doesn't have those silly metal knockouts, that doesn't do anyone any good, that changes their bay configuration, because they can't easily be replaced. Instead it included metal plates that are replaceable, held by screws. Anyone that doesn't replace those twist out knockouts doesn't know anything about security! Ever notice how many cases have about 1/4" diameter holes where the fan goes, that is reminiscent of a Faraday cage? Yes a Faraday cage was inspired by tempest ideologies. (Or maybe it was the other way around, as I'm not sure of the dates of their inception.) A fan would vent warm air much more readily if it had a big square gaping hole, but it would be at the expence of tempest inspired security.
The best case of all would be one with heavy gauge steel (lead? though it's toxic) all the way around, with liquid cooling, with the radiator/s externally mounted and holes just large enough for cables to pass through, that were sheathed in steel mesh and foil just like 75ohm coaxial cable. All of which should be connected to a dedicated earth grounding rod made of copper clad steel that is 5/8" in diameter and 8' long, which has been hammered into a more solid earth substrate, (not sandy or loamy) where the very minimum is left unearthed so as to connect the 6 gauge solid copper grounding wire with a brass acorn nut with a little anti-corrosive compound. Of course a filter should be used on the 110v power line. Additionally all peripherals should also be encased in metal webbing that is connected to the same dedicated ground. But that hardly includes mobile computers, nor is it convenient in the eyes of most users of home/office based systems. I created a tempest inspired room. Computer case concerns are just my doubling down.
The facts are, one should consider the following unsecured: WiFi, cell phones, email, laptops, clouds, anything that transmits over the air or is kept outside your computer. Only grounded shielded wire can be considered somewhat secure, because if done properly it requires physical access to steal your identity. Of course there's always clever internet hackers getting through your firewall. Shouldn't the goal be to eliminate as many flanks of attack as possible? What free thinking individual really wants to be surrounded by probable risk?
Nothing personal to anyone, I've come to this conclusion years ago, no one here at Tom's has told me their computer has windows, so here it goes, I believe that those that have cases with fancy LED lights looking like a Christmas tree with windows are newbies/children/etc, that have no idea what serious computing is. Each to their own, I fully support anyone that want's to do anything to their computer, including smashing it with a crane's wrecking ball. Hey it's their money, time, energy and security, or lack there of, they can do what ever they want! I don't believe in slavery, or programming by corporations for monetary gain. I have and always shall believe in individuals, not parrots, nor clones of group think; (or would that actually be better considered as 'non-think.')
Creative individuals with advanced scientific thinking are those that have always inspired me, certainly not merchandisers of FAD's.
The real shame is that the current market, seemingly, purposely remove choice from knowledgeable computer enthusiasts.
Again, no malice towards any individual here. I point nothing derogatory at anyone particularly. I just make generalized statements that my knowledgeable experience informs. I fully appreciate anyone that cares to involve themselves in college level argument (debate). All trolls, I would ask to go fishing elsewhere, as your immaturity is easily gleaned and found to be severely wanting. In other words, the joke is always on you!
Health, happiness and wisdom to all the computing aficionados, out there.
Peace!