does gtx980 and fx 8350 properly works togethere?

Probably around 15-20% less fps than an I5 4590k on average. Depends on which games you play, battlefield works great on both. For fsx, metro, ac:u or mmorpgs, it will show noticeably less performance than you might expect.
 
Yeah but future titles will work a lot better. Game bottlenecking CPU is an issue with FX processors, hopefully their new lineup is an improvement...

@rapidflyhigh The 8350 can run a single 980 without any bottlenecks, if a game is multithreaded or not is a different matter.

But to even call something this small a bottleneck isn't exactly right, imo.
 


Losing up to 50 fps out of 150 compared to an i5 isn't a bottleneck?
Also no, there is absolutely no reason why fx cpus would fare better at gaming in the future. There is no limitation holding off developers to properly optimize their game, as you can see in a few titles such as battlefield 4 or tomb raider. The broad majority however doesn't spend a lot of time (well, why would they, time spent for no immediate gain) and therefore their games don't run very well on cpus with such awful single core performance.

For reference: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8227/devils-canyon-review-intel-core-i7-4790k-and-i5-4690k/5
 


Absolutely true, for a cost efficient high end gaming rig, nothing beats an i5 4590 and a gtx 970 at the moment.