There almost the same price, and they both overclock good to 3Ghz with stock fans too. Any PROS and CONS you guys can think of of one over the other?
E6400 is a better overclocker for sure!
The difference in price is linear with the performance. So, take the E6400.
E6400 is a better overclocker for sure!
The difference in price is linear with the performance. So, take the E6400.
There almost the same price, and they both overclock good to 3Ghz with stock fans too. Any PROS and CONS you guys can think of of one over the other?
Oh aye. Thanks for that.
Therefore...go with the E6300 due to the increased transfer rate.
However I'm not too sure if the extra multiplier and therefore better overclocking potential will outweigh this....
All i know is that the E4300 is supposedly a cutdown of the E6300.
i.e. its a Celeron equivelant (according to intel) im not too sure what the difference is although i believe that the E6300 has 4MB cache, 2 of which are disabled, i.e. the 6300s are underclocked 6600s that failed quality control on 2MB of the cache (read that somewhere, cant remember where though) and the E4300, Allendale core, has 2MB of physical cache.
Have no idea about the impact of this. However as E4300 is to E6300 as Celeron is to Pentium, I'd be more inclined to go with the E6300.
Personally I'm going for the E6600. Id rather the extra clock speed and cache, but thats just me.