Do you think the video posted is fake ?Strange. For many of us, both Windows 10 and 11 (I use both) are fast and responsive. And barely if ever crash.
We must be doing something really wrong .
Do you think the video posted is fake ?Strange. For many of us, both Windows 10 and 11 (I use both) are fast and responsive. And barely if ever crash.
We must be doing something really wrong .
Like what? I can't think of a major piece of software outside of games that has come out in the last 10 years that Windows only. Even games are starting to be less and less Windows only.some specialized software exist only for Windows
Go into a hospital radiology lab, and look at the MRI monitoring screen. Now convince Toshiba and Olympus to create Linux variants.Like what? Nothing developed in the last 10 years besides games is Windows specific and even games are becoming a stretch these days.
I suppose you have never heard of Medtronic???Go into a hospital radiology lab, and look at the MRI monitoring screen. Now convince Toshiba and Olympus to create Linux variants.
Aircraft software is completely different, and generally very very customized/proprietary.I suppose you have never heard of Medtronic???
Now go into any airplane cockpit... Now try to convince GE and Honeywell to create Windows variants.
My point this there is a viable alternative to that software on other systems. That would be like saying Notepad++ is unique to Windows when Visual Studio code with a plugin does the exact same functionality for macOS and Linux. Sure that specific app was never updated to work on something other than Windows, but new alternatives work cross platform.I'm just giving a viewpoint that there IS software that is Windows/Not Linux.
My point this there is a viable alternative to that software on other systems. That would be like saying Notepad++ is unique to Windows when Visual Studio code with a plugin does the exact same functionality for macOS and Linux. Sure that specific app was never updated to work on something other than Windows, but new alternatives work cross platform.
I also said major software. MRI's, Aviation, etc. are very industry specific. If we want to go down that road I can name more things that require Linux than Windows, especially in the server world. Windows server is quickly becoming obsolete.
BTW, aviation software is largely build on unix and linux kernels, many being forks of public offerings, some closed source like QNX.
Linux is absolutely replacing Windows in a lot of areas.I can't think of a major piece of software outside of games that has come out in the last 10 years that Windows only.
Linux of course, for? everythingMost people, yes.
What do you use, and for what?
Forgive me for saying this, but it also could be a sign of a bad sys admin.I see office employees casually opening Taskmanager to restart explorer. That's a sign of buggy software.
Unfortunately device driver support for Linux is rather rough. Which includes video/audio. I dabble in Linux. It is ok. But I would rather use it as a server vs desktop solution.Linux of course, for? everything
"everything" is not a what.Linux of course, for? everything
98% of the hardware works out of the box.Unfortunately device driver support for Linux is rather rough. Which includes video/audio. I dabble in Linux. It is ok. But I would rather use it as a server vs desktop solutin.
yes, most of the people are spyed 24/24 by multiple companies and governs (and they pay for it rather than being payed)... very sad and disappointing..."everything" is not a what.
But, whatever.
Yes, people do still use Windows. nudge nudge...'most' people.
Ok that's fair. I'm not trying to say there is no use for Windows either, just that for the average desktop user, be it Windows or macOS or Linux, software that targets a specific system is starting to become a thing of the past because cross platform development has become much easier over the last decade and become easier every year.Linux is absolutely replacing Windows in a lot of areas.
My only point was that there ARE some things that are not available in Linux. Some of them not so trivial.
A lot of Linux people don't believe this to be true.
No. But this person having problems is meaningless in the world of statistics.Do you think the video posted is fake ?
If you have 1 bug every 1000000 runs it is a huge problem also if statistics says no.No. But this person having problems is meaningless in the world of statistics.
Or do you think statistics are fake?
There are well known rules to UI design that will result in a clean, efficient interface. Win11 just doesn't even try. MS added complexity to already simply tasks for the sake of what? To make it pretty? I'll admit I do like the new aesthetic, and some of the menus are great, once you get to them....and that's the issue at heart. Three and four clicks to get to what was in many cases, one or two at most.The old guard clings to what they know....resists change. automatically finding fault.
cost management like OPUS and NeodataLike what? I can't think of a major piece of software outside of games that has come out in the last 10 years that Windows only. Even games are starting to be less and less Windows only.
They want to steer users to their search results, and to promote their Bing/AI servicesThey never should have integrated online search results to begin with. Leave that for web browsers and stick to searching what's on the device or integrated via cloud storage services (for files that are downloaded on demand)
Ex-Windows developer Andy Young published an X post showcasing horrendous performance issues he's been experiencing on Windows 11, specifically related to the start menu.
Ex-Windows developer calls Windows 11 Start menu performance 'comically bad,' even with a Core i9 and 128GB of RAM : Read more
Can you tell by the video if the issue for him (or anybody else) was with windows or with the internet connection?! Or with him compiling on all cores with real time priority, or with his anti-virus? or, or, or, or.If you have 1 bug every 1000000 runs it is a huge problem also if statistics says no.
However here the problems are not rare as testified by others.
Please do not try to use mirrors to justify bad programming. It is a simple menu, not a nuclear power plant. There are simple ways to prevent such bugs also in case of connection problems, low memory, high CPU usage, slow disk and so on.Can you tell by the video if the issue for him (or anybody else) was with windows or with the internet connection?! Or with him compiling on all cores with real time priority, or with his anti-virus? or, or, or, or.
Not my case, I prefer to have a rapid, simple, customizable and performant Start Menu that work flawlessly 100% of the times.The original start menu was just a collection of shortcut files and if somebody wants only that then they can make a folder on the desktop and dump all of their shortcut icons into that and have a good time, organize by making even more folders.
You can even pin that folder to quick access or to start, that is even going to be windows update compatible, if you want to keep living in 1998 there is nothing stopping you.
I think they can't help themselves. If they don't "innovate" they stagnate and surrender their entire business. If they can't come up with good ideas or tech, they will come up with ANYTHING just to sell then next OS and be able to say they've "innovated".It has always puzzled me why microsoft keep bringing out new operating systems because i have always used the old saying ..... if its not broke dont fix it.