So many people here commenting on 3d, how many have had the chance to play on a proper setup?
[citation][nom]iam2thecrowe[/nom]you would probably have to use it for yourself to make your mind up on that. 24fps steady is not to bad since with vsync it will pretty much remain at 24fps, no more no less. but agreed that ATM its for spoilt rich kids and 3D enthusiasts, definitely not for most people. Also that 24fps cap is due to the hdmi interface so future improvements will be there when 3d become4s cheaper and more popular. I still havn't seen it for myself to pass judgement.[/citation]
Why should you say the kids are spoilt, its not their fault if their parents happen to be successful! And I am no rich enthusiast, I just saved up my hard earned money for the experience! I did not buy a big new car and stopped drinking beer for a year when I go out, its healthier as well!!
[citation][nom]FlukieLukie[/nom]I use my PC on a 40" Samsung 3D TV, I've only trialed the drivers and they are... okay but barely work with DX10 or 11 games.Still the bollocks is where you have to buy the drivers and there are two avaliable each with their own perks, at least with 3D vision you get the technology with the card.AMD need to invest in getting these technologies to the customers for free.[/citation]
I agree somewhat, most games are still dx9, with a few dx10/11, my fav game is still dx9 LOTRO. But so are all consoles, at a lower resolution with less texture detail!
Overall, sitting 3 meters away from a 50" TV is looks bloody fantastic! DDD is th better driver, trialed them both, but you do need to tweek each game through the onscreen setup for each game to suit your view, it takes 20mins or so to set comfortable profile up for each game, but its worth it!
And yes, it should be free, included in on your driver cd, or in catalyst drivers!
"Right now...3d is for suckers with money to blow."
I take it you have no money then?