Fair & Flexible

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

>He compared three plans, and concluded that the F&F plan was "better",
>even though it cost more.
>
>Apparently your mileage varied.

as we all know - "BETTER" is a very hard thing to define. Better for me is
different than better for you.

--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:17:09 GMT, O/Siris <0sîrîs@sprîntpcs.côm>
wrote:

>In article <h44eg0h8acl2pp8r10t6n4t0hp3sdvbkiq@4ax.com>,
>abuse.catcher@att.netabuse.catcher@att.net says...
>> He compared three plans, and concluded that the F&F plan was "better",
>> even though it cost more.
>>
>
>No, I did *not*. I said they were comparable.

Ok. Last time. I posted *my* interpretation of your comments. If I
misunderstood, then so be it.

The wonders of usenet, misunderstandings happen.


--
Deb

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

abuse.catcher@att.net wrote:
>
> Ok. Last time. I posted *my* interpretation of your comments. If I
> misunderstood, then so be it.
>
> The wonders of usenet, misunderstandings happen.
>

Is that an apology? It seems like you owe him one to me.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBCGFH1p0e3NXsrtERAk0bAKCIClUlDD9puj2UiCZlHWGCHuUi0QCfViTz
elZL1yNa4UJs/G6BmkUdXPw=
=JFb0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

On 29 Jul 2004 02:30:33 GMT, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>> Ok. Last time. I posted *my* interpretation of your comments. If I
>> misunderstood, then so be it.
>>
>> The wonders of usenet, misunderstandings happen.
>>
>
>Is that an apology? It seems like you owe him one to me.

If I offended him, tyes, I apologize for any offense I may have given.

That I interpreted his post, based on my reading, differently than the
general concensus, or even how he may have intended when he wrote it,
I don't see that an apology is warranted.

Misunderstandings are common in this type of forum, where the each
post is essentially an observation of, or response to, another post,
ultimately resuting in a conversation conducted in one sided bursts
of dialog. If an apology was required for every instance of a
different interpretation of a post than the poster intended, I suspect
the servers would be flooded very quickly.




--
Deb