G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:40:29 -0800, Dark Tyger
<darktiger@somewhere.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:40:27 -0600, Faned <faned@wyld.qx.net> wrote:
>
>><myfirstname@thecomdomaincalledSHADOWPIKE> wrote:
>>>
>>> I told the guy I would discuss with the officer team and get back to him.
>>> Not much to discuss, but we did, and the next day I de-guilded the guy.
>>
>>Congratulations on de-guilding someone who broke no rules and then actually
>>apologized in spite of not having broken any rules. =P
>
>You mean other than lying to the guild leader and pressuring to have
>the application process changed for him so he could hide an unpleasant
>past? I'll bet you that had the child been honest about his past and
>displayed a capability and willingness to act civil, he wouldn't have
>been removed. But he lied. To the guild leader. That alone is enough
>to get you removed from most guilds, and god damned rightfully so.
Bloody right!
Palindrome
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:40:29 -0800, Dark Tyger
<darktiger@somewhere.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:40:27 -0600, Faned <faned@wyld.qx.net> wrote:
>
>><myfirstname@thecomdomaincalledSHADOWPIKE> wrote:
>>>
>>> I told the guy I would discuss with the officer team and get back to him.
>>> Not much to discuss, but we did, and the next day I de-guilded the guy.
>>
>>Congratulations on de-guilding someone who broke no rules and then actually
>>apologized in spite of not having broken any rules. =P
>
>You mean other than lying to the guild leader and pressuring to have
>the application process changed for him so he could hide an unpleasant
>past? I'll bet you that had the child been honest about his past and
>displayed a capability and willingness to act civil, he wouldn't have
>been removed. But he lied. To the guild leader. That alone is enough
>to get you removed from most guilds, and god damned rightfully so.
Bloody right!
Palindrome