It's worth noting that the reason this has gone past the initial screening is that in the initial phase of litigation, the allegations (that the producers know or should have known about and failed to warn about the addictive nature of the game, the game caused harm, etc.) are taken as true. This is a Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. The next phase will be a motion for summary judgment, where the standard is whether no material issue of fact exists for a jury to decide upon. It's also likely that the plaintiff will past muster here, given the nature of negligence litigation.