Gaming And Streaming: Which CPU Is Best For Both?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SonnyNXiong

Prominent
Aug 6, 2017
120
0
710
Best answers
6
Core i7 7700k is the best, can't get any better than that except for a high OC speed and high core clock speed on that core i7 7700k.
 

mcconkeymike

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
1,060
0
20,160
Best answers
234
Sonny, I disagree. I personally run the 7700k at 4.9ghz, but the 8700k 6 core/12 thread is a badass and does what the 7700k does and better. Please do a little research on this topic otherwise you'll end up looking foolish.
 

AndrewJacksonZA

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2011
450
1
18,785
Best answers
0

Yeah. It'll be interesting to see the impact on Windows. Phoronix ( https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-415-x86pti&num=2 ) shows a heavy hit in Linux for some tasks, but apparently almost no hit in gaming ( https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=x86-PTI-Initial-Gaming-Tests )

Although gaming in Linux, seriously?! C'mon! ;-)
 

AgentLozen

Distinguished
May 2, 2011
513
0
19,010
Best answers
22
What a great article. It really highlights the advantage of having more cores. If you're strictly into gaming without streaming, then Kaby Lake (and Skylake by extension) is still an awesome choice. It was really interesting to see it fall apart when streaming was added to the formula. I wasn't expecting it to do so poorly even in an overclocked setting.
 

Soda-88

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2011
1,084
0
19,460
Best answers
76
A couple of complaints:
1) the article is 10 months late
2) the game choice is poor, you should've picked titles that are popular on twitch

Viewer count at present moment:
BF1: ~1.300
GTA V: ~17.000
ME - SoW: ~600

Personally, I'd like to see Overwatch over BF1 and PUBG over ME: SoW.
GTA V is fine since it's rather popular, despite being notoriously Intel favoured.

Other than that, a great article with solid methodology.
 

guadalajara296

Reputable
Oct 21, 2015
32
1
4,545
Best answers
1
I do a lot of video encoding / rendering in Adobe cc premier pro
It takes 2 hours to render a video on Skylake cpu. would a Ryzen multi core improve that by 50% ?
 

salgado18

Distinguished
Feb 12, 2007
541
7
18,995
Best answers
3


Please, don't feed the trolls. Thanks.
 

lsatenstein

Honorable
Mar 8, 2012
75
0
10,630
Best answers
0
To be able to respond to Paul's opening comment about reputability testing, the rule is to have at least 19 test runs. The 19 runs will provide a 5 percent confidence interval. That means or could be understood to be 19/20 the results will be within 5 percent of the mean, which is about 1 standard deviation.
 

lsatenstein

Honorable
Mar 8, 2012
75
0
10,630
Best answers
0
The new flaw discovered with older existing CPUS does not affect your testing above, because your cpus are post flaw detection. But for the average person on the street (me), who does have older Intel CPUs, I just lost between 10% and 20% cpu performance, be it windows or Linux.


Security
'Kernel memory leaking' Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign
Google the title for more info.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
May 18, 2007
16,186
207
81,640
Best answers
2,361

None of the sources I have found exempt any Intel CPUs from the flaw which appears to affect all of Intel's x86-64 CPUs up to current. It takes several months of R&D past detection to design and manufacture a new chip with the fixes baked-in, which means that unless Intel knew about the flaw 4+ months ahead of Coffee Lake's launch, then all current Intel chips have the flaw.
 

razamatraz

Honorable
Feb 12, 2014
200
0
10,710
Best answers
21
Wasn't the Ring-0 bug described found in 2015? At the time there was no demonstration that it actually could be abused if I recall correctly but Intel should have taken it seriously when designing Coffee Lake CPUs...not sure if they did; the list of affected CPUs is still under NDA. In any case it seems to have much more effect on machines running VMs, multiple simultaneous users etc than on typical single user gaming machines as you'd have to already be compromised for this bug to have any impact on a single user machine...IE they'd have to get malware on your machine in the first place. This bug doesn't help anyone do that.

Waiting on actual answers, expected in the next week or two.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
May 18, 2007
16,186
207
81,640
Best answers
2,361

None of the stories I've read about it so far make any mention of the actual date where Intel was made aware of the bug. If Microsoft had a patch ready for such a severe bug (unrestricted access to kernel space from user land) less than two months ago, I'd be surprised if Intel has been sitting on it for over a year: that would be a huge liability for Intel if a company got hacked and found out Intel knew about the vulnerability that enabled the hack long beforehand.
 

Honis

Distinguished
Mar 16, 2009
702
0
18,980
Best answers
0
I like how this shows how great multi-threaded performance can be with multiple proceses running in the background.

I know when I game, I may not stream but I usually have a browser open and a few sites I frequent have junky autoplay videos. My Ryzen 7 and I would think an i7-8 series, handles these intermittent hiccups nicer than the 4 core processors.
 

Yuka

Splendid
May 3, 2007
6,416
95
26,240
Best answers
154
Thanks for this review. It really does bring nice information to the table.

Are you going to test with more forgiving settings? I can stream decently with 720p and 30FPS using my i7 2700K (no hard figures though), pretty much every single game out there. And will you guys update the numbers once the security patches are in place? I'd love to see how that affects Streaming.

Cheers!
 

cryoburner

Splendid
Oct 8, 2011
3,104
134
22,990
Best answers
465

The problem with games like Overwatch and Battlegrounds is that it would be difficult to get meaningful performance numbers out of them. Those games can only be played online, and there's no real way to control what other players are doing during a match. That's why they pick games where their tests can be performed in single player mode, where there can be relatively little variance between one benchmark run and the next.
 

DerekA_C

Prominent
Mar 1, 2017
177
0
690
Best answers
1
@Cryoburner, the fact is most streamers don't stream single player games they stream multiplayer, something with actual competition, but I do get why they tested it that way. However, it isn't very realistic to stream only single player it has to demonstrate those variances.
 

James Mason

Titan
Moderator
Jan 2, 2014
13,545
4
79,165
Best answers
3,019
I wish this had a "dynamic" Price to Performance metric at the end that could compare to the prices you pull from amazon/newegg to how good the CPUs (or GPUs/whatever) to provide an always relevant way to decide what's the best choice for whoever and whenever sees the article.
 

Plumboby

Respectable
Apr 18, 2016
1,079
0
2,660
Best answers
156
Um streaming & recording my trusty old i52400 with 8gig ram & Sapphire pulse RX560 4G is prety impressive for the age of build & the Videocard gives any big dady build a run for their $. The relive AMD runs is silky smooth to record with you dont notice it live broadcasting or recording gameplay is silky smooth on Andrenaline drivers which are meant to be bugged coz of dx9 not working (not true). The worst thing is no 1 actually tests the original mainsteam builds of yester year which is bs & no true real test of the years of streaming & recording. I got a channel open for the builds of yester year which regarded as out dated crap uploading daily to prove a point dont need wads of $ & big buget build to record gameplay & stream with it effecting preformance or lag. been impressed with my Sandy Bridge even on online multiplayer games with server lag isnt noticed you dont need a beast of a build to keep up with the elite group just to record gameplay or stream, i have proven it with a true review of my AMD card as been no true real honest tests. half the bench test Toms & others carried out is heavily flawed. The best way to test is real world open game testing for hrs on end throught out 10 titles even on older builds to give a fairer representation of results. Hence why i started a channel for the not so mainstream old builds to prove that you dont need a new gen build to keep up & be able to game smoothly & always happy to allow others to share there low end build gameplay on my channel to represent more options. To any of the Toms moderators & tester you need for a fairer test stop doing tho BS benchmarks they are not true to the number you need to test between all older mainstream builds to new for the fairest guides & representation as Any online Benchmark is flawed when your only testing what alot cant afford.
 

PaulAlcorn

Senior Editor
Editor
Feb 24, 2015
665
18
4,985
Best answers
0


Good eye, thanks for the headsup Elbert! That is a typo, which I have now corrected. We tested with 16GB for both machines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS