GeForce GTX 670 2 GB Review: Is It Already Time To Forget GTX 680?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

rglaredo

Honorable
Mar 26, 2012
170
0
10,690
excellent review ..why even bother hyping us for something that is nowhere to be found? ...yea all the 600's will be better than AMD's...but as of today ...AMD is the only true option ...because they are in stock ...so why bother to sit and wait ..and wait ...and wait ..or go to ebay or amazon and pay an extra premium on those cards ?? hell no...
 
[citation][nom]Chesteracorgi[/nom]What will AMD do with the 7990 to beat out the GTX 690? It seems the only niche where they have a chabnce to beat Nvidia.[/citation]

AMD would need to raise clocks on their Tahitis in the 7990 to beat the 690 for most games, from the looks of this. We might know more about what needs to be done after a review of the 7970s versus 680s, both full updated and including overclocking results.

Regardless, the 7990 would probably need two Tahitis with at least 1GHz clock frequencies to fight the 690 for most games, probably even higher, at least until the 690's mere 2GB of VRAM becomes a limitation (5760x1080 and 5760x1200 can choke 2GB if AA is too high in some games). Unless AMD can make even better power efficiency improvements on the 7990 compared to the 7970 than Nvidia did with the 690 compared to the 680, it won't be easy.

Besides that, the 7970 keeps up with the 680 more than well enough. The problem now is the spread between the 670 and 7950 (at stock, reference clocks, of course).
 

That's the card I'm waiting on also. With Nvidia's bin system though who knows when that card is going to be available. I read where we wont see it until the end of his summer.
 

tirvon

Honorable
May 10, 2012
42
0
10,540
Woot! Just ordered my 670 on Newegg! Great article too. Perfect timing. Almost bought a 680 last night, and now very glad I didn't!
 
G

Guest

Guest
Ok 4.5% less performance and $100 less cost, now its time for the $200 less cost 10% less performance 660ti!
 

opalarrow

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2012
33
0
18,540
This is definitely making me consider buying the 570 instead. I hope I can get my hands on one before they go out of stock...
 

Metroidam11

Honorable
Feb 19, 2012
25
0
10,530
They make a good point with the whole chess thing. Anyone know how much it actually causes the manufacturer to make these cards? How much profit is Nvidia or EVGA getting from selling a $400 card?
 
[citation][nom]BigMack70[/nom]What I'm curious about is: would the market have a place for a dual GTX 670 card priced around $750-800? My guess is that a dual GTX 670 card would occupy the same market slot as the eventual 7990, preventing AMD from undercutting Nvidia on price.Don't think NVDA can supply enough GK104 to do that, but it would be sweet.[/citation]

I remember in the days of Radeon 4000, Sapphire did that with a 4850X2. It was more expensive than a GTX 275 and didn't perform that well, so it remained kind of obscure.

Then last generation EVGA made a GTX 570 2Win or something that combined 2 GTX 570 onto one PCB. That actually performed very admirably.

I personally would love to see a GTX 685, combining 2 GTX 670 GPUs, priced at $750.
 

wiyosaya

Distinguished
Apr 12, 2006
915
1
18,990
I was in the market for a new graphics card as I am completing a new build. I shied away from AMD because they are not as widely supported for BOINC projects, and given the double-precision processing power of the nVidia 6XX series, I also shied away from them I ended up with a 1.5GB GTX 580 that I got for $378 new after rebate. Availability problems of 6XX series solved for me. :)

Seems like recent releases have been a one-up-manship between the two companies. I think it is unfortunate in that they are both, as I see it, pushing vaporware. It seems less than productive and a disservice to their customers to not have enough product to fill demands.

Then again, in economic theory, it is well known that high demand and low supply push prices and profits higher. Perhaps this is the reason both AMD and nVidia are selling cards with limited supplies. I share the same viewpoint. Even though my main use is presently not gaming, we both want cards to be available.
 

murambi

Distinguished
Jul 12, 2011
15
0
18,510
wow Nvidia aint taking no prisoners. Amd will have to reduce prices again but common I cant seem to get even a single card on sale
 
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]Please feel free to suggest games you'd like to see added! I've been running this collection of what I consider to be pretty-popular titles, but am always happy to add more, time permitting. Getting this piece finished in time was hard enough after the requests to re-run all of the cards using the latest drivers in the GTX 690 story, but we did what we could to address that one. As mentioned, though, the German team does use a different suite on the charts with a more spread-out emphasis that includes older titles, too.[/citation]some games that would be nice would be:
Alan Wake, Portal 2, Witcher 2, AvP, Civ 5 and Total War: shogun 2.
 
[citation][nom]wiyosaya[/nom]I was in the market for a new graphics card as I am completing a new build. I shied away from AMD because they are not as widely supported for BOINC projects, and given the double-precision processing power of the nVidia 6XX series, I also shied away from them I ended up with a 1.5GB GTX 580 that I got for $378 new after rebate. Availability problems of 6XX series solved for me. Seems like recent releases have been a one-up-manship between the two companies. I think it is unfortunate in that they are both, as I see it, pushing vaporware. It seems less than productive and a disservice to their customers to not have enough product to fill demands.Then again, in economic theory, it is well known that high demand and low supply push prices and profits higher. Perhaps this is the reason both AMD and nVidia are selling cards with limited supplies. I share the same viewpoint. Even though my main use is presently not gaming, we both want cards to be available.[/citation]

Both companies pushing vaporware? Just going to newegg, you'll see over 70 in-stock AMD models (ranging from the 7750 to 7970) and less than 10 in stock Nvidia models (ranging from the 670 to 690). It's just Nvidia who is having supply problems. AMD has plenty of supply.

EDIT: I just counted and newegg has 6 cards in stock out of 23 total (only new 670s are in stock, that probably won't last long. There is a seventh 670 that is already out of stock) and AMD has 73 out of 84 cards in stock (5 7850s out of 11 are out, 1 7870 out of 15, 1 7950 out of 13, and four out of 20 7970s, all 12 7750s and all 13 7770s are in stock). AMD has plenty of cards in stock and Nvidia has only 670s.
 
[citation][nom]opalarrow[/nom]This is definitely making me consider buying the 570 instead. I hope I can get my hands on one before they go out of stock...[/citation]

The 570 is about half as fast as the 670 and 680 and has only 25% more than half the VRAM. Unless you find one for under $200, it's a far worse purchase than the 670.
 
[citation][nom]Metroidam11[/nom]They make a good point with the whole chess thing. Anyone know how much it actually causes the manufacturer to make these cards? How much profit is Nvidia or EVGA getting from selling a $400 card?[/citation]

They're making a lot of money. Both the PCB and the GPU are small (that PCB is tiny for a high end card, perhaps the smallest in years for such a card) and they only have 8 256MiB RAM chips, so cost of manufacturing is probably minimal. If the rumors of some of the components being cheapies are true, then it only solidifies the profit margins. Cost of manufacturing and shipping these cards is probably a mere fraction of what they are charging for the cards. AMD, on the other hand, is probably making a considerably less money with their slightly larger GPUs, 50% more RAM chips, and larger PCBs. It's probably still cheaper to make the GCN cards than the Fermi cards anyway, but these prices probably hurt AMD much more than they hurt Nvidia.
 
Adding those titles will certainly make the AMD line look better (see that techpowerup has those). Even then, the 7950 is no contest. The 7970 wins the majority (10 of 18) benches but the real story is that it only does so by more than 3fps in 4 of 18. The 670:
- uses 34-108 watts less under various loads
- is 6db quieter under load
- costs $50+ less
For me, all of those things have great value. I was within inches of buying a 7970 due to the lack of 680s and now very glad I didn't.
 

catatafish

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2012
448
0
18,810
No one is having a supply problem. It's their high end card and they won't sell a ton of them. They make those for bragging rights to market their brand name and for R&D. Their bread and butter will be the card that most people buy, which will cost half as much as a 680 or 670. Try not to look at this like two football teams you are rooting for, and who kicks more ass. These are businesses and this is a calculated strategy that many companies use. Nvidia is making just as many as they want to. I'll bet you an SLI 690 rig that when the bread and butter product is launched, there are PLENTY of them.
 

baracubra

Distinguished
Jan 24, 2008
312
0
18,790
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]If that's something you want to continue seeing moving forward, I'll start putting them back in. Nobody had commented on tessellation performance for months, though, so I was trying to avoid cluttering things up[/citation]

Its not that I specifically want to see tesselation numbers, but you mentioned it in the list of your benchmark suite and I didn't see it throughout the review. I guess if you're gonna take the time to bench it you might as well add in the image/graph with a short comment somewhere. I find it interesting to see the evolution of tesselation scaling with the release of newer generation cards (esp. when it gets worse with the release of the new 600 series)...

Cheers, Bara
 
Status
Not open for further replies.