Gigabyte Aivia Uranium Wireless Gaming Mouse Review

[FormatC]

Gigabyte's Aivia Uranium wireless gaming mouse is certainly a bit different. It might not be the ideal peripheral for all enthusiasts. However, there are those who will undoubtedly consider this feature-rich mouse to be everything that they need.

Gigabyte Aivia Uranium Wireless Gaming Mouse Review : Read more

 

[jankeke]

Nice review !But on the 2nd page, 9th § you wrote :This is another place where Gigabyte's Aivia Uranium offers good economics.I guess it should say :This is another place where Gigabyte's Aivia Uranium offers good ergonomics.

 

[FormatC]

Typical translation mistake.... Thx. I'll inform the guys to fix this asap.

 

[kamhagh]

in My option, this is stupid !

 

[-Fran-]

Philips PLN 2032 Twin-Eye Laser.Do not buy.Cheers!

 

[kamhagh]

i would rather buy g602 (have it currently and love it) G600 or g700s! maybe g100 or g500s depends on need

 

[Boo Bies]

120 for a mouse? No thanks

 

[Phillip Wager]

this just does not seem worth the high price. it just seems like too much of an office mouse than a gaming mouse honestly thats marketed for gamers.

 

[ferooxidan]

Using Microsoft Mouse wireless 4000 and still owning Dota 2 nicely. Cheers

 

[atavax]

I don't understand why you think heavy is ok for low sensitivity and bad for high sensitivity. It is quite the opposite. Low sensitivity means you are moving your mouse way more and lifting your mouse way more, which means heft is a big problem. While many high sensitivity players move their mouse very little and many actually prefer heavy mice.

 

[atavax]

Also many low sensitivity players use 400 or 450 dpi. the lowest native step being 800 is not good for low sensitivity players.5600 DPI is ridiculously high. Almost all professional shooter players use below 1000 dpi. The higher the max dpi, the more smoothing is needed to be built into the mouse to counter jitter, the laggier the mouse is. Any mouse above 3,000 dpi is not taking high level mouse performance seriously.