Unfortunately it's so subjective and hard to get a concrete number in the graphics game that it would be hard to prosecute under false advertising laws/statutes.
The BCD123 is twice as fast as the competition (in the original quake [yet 1/4 as fast in UT2K3]). Heck look at the XGI's specs and they'd be able to say that their cards have twice the power, etc. fill rate and such of the map, yet we all know that it's barely (if that) half the card of the top FX and Radeons.
Even things like the benchmarking issues of the summer, or the current one with FM and 3Dmk03 published scores don't have enough legal power to follow through on allegations of impropriety.
I just don't think there is enough legal backing to do anything; even if someone were to say something that we all thought was blatantly false, even if there was a grain of truth in some abstract product-centric measure, then that would be enough to shout this BS as loud as they could.
I expect PR BS from both sides, it just needs to be pointed out when it occurs. Like pretty much everything coming out of XGI at this time, just look at the ad above this thread (if it loads the right one). Ultimate Performance Unprecedented Quality? According to what, by whose standard!?! Maybe if compared to other dual VPU solutions (Rage Fury Maxx, etc), but not when compared to current products IMO.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
