Graphics by the numbers

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
I think the problem here is you bottom feeders in the jean pool of life haven't a clue what was typed in the post so as all morons do they get nasty and type [-peep-] up because they don't know how to have an intelligent conversation.

END OF STORY.

Barton 3200+ 400MHz
A7N8X Deluxe
Liquid
2x512 KinstonHyperX PC3200
GeForce FX5900
Maxtor DiamondMaxPlus9@80Gig
SONY CD 52x
SONY RW 52x/24x/52x
SONY DVD 16x/40x
 
I hope you're right, because I just coughed up $428 for the 5950. ATI, been there, done that. Besides, I don't want to support those Canandian bastards anyway, thanks for all the help in Iraq, NOT! God Bless America!
 
Bottom feeders? Me and my cousin, I mean, my wife resent that remark!
Hey, if you can't flame a total stranger in a forum, what fun is it?
Seriously though, can't we all get along?
 
OK here is a thought!! I am a Canadian Basterd and I use Nvidia products not because I hate ATI but simply because I have seen both plants and ATI is a very nice plant and from what I saw a great working environment one of the best.

But I have also seen some of the contractors plants that build the Nvidia product and state of the art is an understatement.

ATI does most of their own work but Nvidia does contract most work out so you need to LOOK at the card and who made it to get the best type of that card. ASUS, NVIDIA and XFX all make GeForce cards and are very good at it. There are other manufactures that also make those Geforce cards but I have not been to those manufactures plants.

P.S please leave a message I am going off to play Day Of Defeat for the next 6 hours so I can kick all the bloody hackers out I mean BAN their WON id numbers.

That insulting ad in the top left of Tom's hardware guide pisses me off because WE WILL TELL IF YOU CHEAT AND WE WILL KICK YOUR HACKING ASS OF THE SERVER WE PAY FOR.... sorry for shouting I feel better 😉

Barton 3200+ 400MHz
A7N8X Deluxe
Liquid
2x512 KinstonHyperX PC3200
GeForce FX5900
Maxtor DiamondMaxPlus9@80Gig
SONY CD 52x
SONY RW 52x/24x/52x
SONY DVD 16x/40x
 
Your on Michael1699 some of the best people I know are bottomfeeders because they are real people. That is what counts in the end right.

Barton 3200+ 400MHz
A7N8X Deluxe
Liquid
2x512 KinstonHyperX PC3200
GeForce FX5900
Maxtor DiamondMaxPlus9@80Gig
SONY CD 52x
SONY RW 52x/24x/52x
SONY DVD 16x/40x
 
That was kinda an attack on SoD...not you at all.

You gave incorrect info and I said you were acting like him. (just you did it intentionally)

You were mimicking him in otherwords.

Damn Rambus.
 
I pissed on my neighbor's car door lastnight....

<b><font color=red>3DMark03</font color=red></b>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928</A>
<b><font color=red>3DMark 2001SE</b></font color=red>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806</A>
 
Add a FX58000 even nicer numbers in some area!!!
WOW DDRII @ 1ghz ram it must be fasssssst\
at least on paper =)
 
Oh, I thought you were talking about raw performance...I agree that it's great for value/noise (especially in its performance category).

Damn Rambus.
 
Captain Bullsh!t says, "Thank you SoDNighthawk! Without you the depth of bullsh!t on this board wouldn't be adaquete for me to survive!"
 
In fact.. ..ATI 9800 anything is a Model T ford compaired to the Geforce 5950. By the numbers.
Click to expand...
By who's numbers? Hopefully not yours because it appears you can't count;

"<i>Rendering Pixel pipelines. 16</i>"

4x2 = <A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031023/nvidia-nv38-nv36-02.html" target="_new">8 pixel pipelines</A>, not 16. And considering that often they run 4x1 depending on the app, I would say ATI has the advnatage there.

And the final numbers are performance, and there the FX5950 straps what appear to be monster specs, to terrible performance. Whereas the ATI has lower specs but equal or better performance.

Graphics by the numbers? No sounds like drivel by the dozen.

Specs don't impress, final performance does, or else everyone would be buying XGI cards, since the SPECs are VERY impressive. The reality however is much different.

Also I guess the Parhelia is a far superior card by the numbers since it has a 512 bit core, has 3 ramdacs, and can support 3 displays. Awesome! Guess it wins the numbers game.
Now let's play a Shell Game!


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>
 
I pissed on my neighbor's car door lastnight....
Click to expand...
Aww Damn, I thought that was morning dew from the cold weather!

Ewww! Now I've gotta check with the CDC to see what I've contracted.

Well I guess it coulda been worse, after I cleaned off that 'mud' with my tongue I thought I tasted a hint of corn! 😱


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:

<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>
 
:lol:

<b><font color=red>3DMark03</font color=red></b>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1790928</A>
<b><font color=red>3DMark 2001SE</b></font color=red>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7381806</A>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom