[citation][nom]de5_roy[/nom]not another one again. how many of these have come out including this one? 5, 6 or more may be. everyone keeps saying hdd shortage will persist for a long time. how about taking measures to lower ssd prices? if a company like intel can take steps to lower ultrabooks costs why not do the same with ssd?[/citation]
the bluray player cost a crap ton when it was new. sony put one in the ps3, and under cut the cost but a absolute crap ton to ensure that they won that war.
intel most likely timed some of the fat off their cpu line, and possibly under cut the cost, just to make sure amd wasn't a viable option, and people didn't get use to ultrabook = amd
now with ssd, there is about 21tb per waffer, and my math is based off of a new ssd that isnt priced to move (as in doesn't cost less than production)
i dont know how big ssd chips (the insides, not the plastic houses) are, if anyone does, tell me so i can adjust my math.
but because ssds are silicon based, and silicon costs about 50 grand a wafer, they are tied almost exclusively to how low the process they use is... at least till you get really high up there in ssd size, than its more about opportunists.
[citation][nom]CaedenV[/nom]even after they get production up in Feb/Mar it will take a few more months to catch up with demand, and then after demand is caught up with it will be a while before they recoup their repair costs and lost time. So it is not greed (necessarily), it is just how business works. Besides, they are supposed to be greedy. Greed combined with competition is what keeps quality high, prices low, and innovation coming.What I really would like to know is how this will effect the production of 4 and 6TB drives which are supposed to come out this year. Perhaps we will see a permanent shift of SSDs for system drives, and HDDs for data storage. Just stop producing anything smaller than 500GB.My bet is that most companies will be back to normal prices next fall because the companies less effected will want to bury and steal as many customers as possible from those who will take longer to recover.[/citation]
the manufactures can make a 10-20% hike in price, we wouldn't care. if a 100$ hdd now costs 120-130, its not that big of a difference, considering is a piece of hardware that is ususaly insured for 5 years and can have a life time longer than that... but the retail... they are selling them at 230+
[citation][nom]DaddyW123[/nom]You know what I see in HDD manufacturer's future? Waterproof buildings. Sure the water is up above the windows outside, and you have to take a boat to get to work and climb down from an access door on the roof - but dammit we're still making drives![/citation]
i want to see a buffer floor. a 5 foot floor that is just there to keep machines out from under water, and than another 5 feet of water proof/resistance, any more than that... well... they have more serious problems than if i can get a hdd or not
[citation][nom]keyanf[/nom]So they can't afford to replace the stock once they sell it!Brilliant!Your English is fine, your economics are what you should worry about.[/citation]
the harddrive cost on a whole sale end are barely elevated, but on a retail end, they are over 100% inflated.
-----------------------
all this about supply and demand... i think people need to look at this realistically.
prebuilt machines are getting made, and have the storage, those people aren't upgrading storage when they get a new one, and we have hard drives to satisfy damn near everyone who could need one, not just want one. this isnt a product that once production ramps up we will see everyone buying one... it will be buissness as usual, just at lower prices again.
im doubting that these inflated prices can last much longer than 90-100% production, dont get me wrong they will be elevated, but not horrendously so.