Just an update, on the whole Sandy vs. X58 decision and my recommendations ...
... for those who might dig up this thread, on a web search ...
First, read the conclusion, of this "most recent" (THG) Test/Review/Analysis ...
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/p67-gaming-3-way-sli-three-card-crossfire,2910-17.html
So ... If you MUST buy, now ... It looks like the Unlocked Sandy plus an NF200 Chipset will trounce an X58 with the same core count ... Cost differences, aside.
Nonetheless, as for me, personally, I would still MUCH prefer to wait for the X79/2011 solution, with *FULL* PCIe 3.0 bandwidth, rather than to purchase a (somewhat) kludgy workaround, for the hobbled P67/NF200/1155 socket/bus architechture ... But that's just me.
The full sized socket, 2011, for the Sandies, along with the "free-breathing" and fully flexible X79 Express PCIe 3.x platform is what the original design "intends", and what *I* prefer to insist, upon ....
... For those of you who are after sheer speed/performance, on renders and are not going to load your system with extra GPUs plus screaming slot drives ... The NF200 with an Unlocked Sandy should be just fine (if the price is right) ...
... Here is my current/recommendation, (as noted in this article's conclusion), for those who are going with the Sandy, and cannot wait for 2011/X79 ...
ASUS P8P67 WS REVOLUTION LGA 1155 Intel P67 / NVIDIA NF200 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
B3/Digi+VRM, UEFI BIOS, NF200, Dual Intel LAN, CUDA
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131714
This is a NEW/CHANGE, in my recommendations and I am open to debate, on this choice, as a "best mobo", ... Please feel free to chime in with any thots or other "propsed" superior recommendations (cost/performance).
(But, the conclusions, in this posted article/review "satisfy" my concerns, to a large degree, regarding the Hobbled P67 bandwidth "problem" ... The NF200 chipset is the solution).
This thread is just for graphics/pro and advanced student ws builds. (not gaming).
.