Intel paid out billions from what they did (or allegedly did) 15 years ago and now the FTC and EU/EC are keeping a watchful eye. Fans may not want to admit it, but make no mistake, AMDs current woes are their own doing, whether it be the fault of engineering or marketing.
I would chalk this one up to both . It's not that easy to find a reasonably powerful 2-in-1 under $700 that doesn't have debilitating compromise like the screen, the SSD, the CPU, etc. On top of that, the OEMs expect a lot of engineering support from the CPU manufacturers. I.e. they expect AMD to hand them a reference-design or fund their engineering to create a product that has the specs they want to show-off at specific price-point. HP's offerings are a clear indication of how much support OEMs are getting from cash-strapped AMD.
What you desire will come, but don't expect it to come first from the top-tier OEMs like HP (whether you agree that HP is top-tier or not is another debate).