[citation][nom]adgjlsfhk[/nom]A few problems with the arguments in this. 1: It is based only on general relativity. The inclusion of quantum mechanics solves many of the problems presented.2: It uses God's all powerful-ness as an axiom. This can be proved false quite easily by simple logic. Can god make someone more powerful than himself?3: the universe must either be infinite or curved back on itself in a hypersphere. Therefore, the earth can not be in the sort of gravity well described. 4: The third argument is a joke. It is just as meaningful to say that the bible is actually written in a different language that happens to use the same characters, or that the translator of a particular bible mistranslated someones age as it is to say it might use a different standard of time.5: In the fourth argument, it is missing the fact that we know from the Doppler effect that the rate of the universes expansion is expanding. Therefore, the rate of expansion in the early universe must be less than it is now.6: The biggest problem with the conclusion is that the heat transfer problem would only be a problem if we were looking at the edge of the universe (assuming that exists). These images are only from a point somewhat close to the edge of the observable universe, which fixes the problem.[/citation]
You should know better than to argue with a man of faith. They don't need facts. Believing in spite of facts is consider a badge of honor, and is highly praised..