Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (
More info?)
There wasn't really any sloppyness in early computing. Programmers like even
numbers too. The difference comes in whether you are looking at the numbers
in Binary or Decimal. Put 1024 in Decimal in Calculator and then switch to
Binary. You will get a nice even number.
Joshua Smith
DirectInput and OpenGL Test Labs
Microsoft
-----
Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
"Ron Reaugh" <rondashreaugh@att.net> wrote in message
news:zqG4d.420234$OB3.173410@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> "Bob Day" <xxxxxxx@yyyyyyy.com> wrote in message
> news:uJEnjrXoEHA.3988@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "Ron Reaugh" <rondashreaugh@att.net> wrote in message
>> news
😛Rs4d.622557$Gx4.152330@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >
>> > "Bob Day" <xxxxxxx@yyyyyyy.com> wrote in message
>> > news:eGFsxUSoEHA.2852@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > >
>> > > "Ron Reaugh" <rondashreaugh@att.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:yol4d.621162$Gx4.505750@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> > > >
>> > > > "Bob Day" <xxxxxxx@yyyyyyy.com> wrote in message
>> > > > news:OThTdmMoEHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "JR_004" <JR_004@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > news:243B03DB-EE46-4FCC-949D-3D47287C2B32@microsoft.com...
>> > > > > > I bought a PC from The Computer shop. (I thought Great!!) Top
> specs
>> > with
>> > > > 160
>> > > > > > gig hard drive. When i got it it took a while to get the hang o
> it.
>> > But
>> > > > when
>> > > > > > I checked the hard drive capacity in properties it registered
> 140
>> > Gb. So
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > youd expect my dad phoned "The Computer Shop" and complained.
> The
>> > man
>> > > > told my
>> > > > > > dad that xp took up 15 gig in "hidden hard drive space". But
> that
>> > > > wouldnt
>> > > > > > affect the capacity of the hard drive stats on the properties
> tab.
>> > What
>> > > > do
>> > > > > > yous think. I need some backup before i confromt them. (Theyr
> the
>> > > > geniuses
>> > > > > > apparently lol)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > A GB according to hard drive manufacturers is 1,000,000,000
>> > > > > bytes.
>> > > >
>> > > > And everyone ELSE in science and engineering since before 1900.
>> > > >
>> > > > > In most of the rest of the computing world, a GB is 2**30, or
>> > > > > 1,073,741,824 bytes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, only in the area of the computing world that relates to
> binary
>> > > > addressable entities is that so. In all other areas of computing a
>> > > > G=1e9,M=1e6 & K=1e3.
>> > >
>> > > Nope yourself. I was specifically referring to, and mentioned
>> > > only, GB or gigabytes, where I believe what I wrote is true.
>> >
>> > NOPE, all rates in computers are in classic fashion 10MB/sec. means
>> > 10,000,000 bytes per second. 10MB/sec. meaning 10,000,000 bytes per
> second
>> > and is the correct usage of M. And 1GB/sec. means 1,000,000,000 bytes
> per
>> > sec. and is the correct usage of G.
>> >
>>
>> Nope once again.
>
> Wrong again.
>
>>You are confusing rates with bytes.
>
> Bytes nor rates have anything to do with the issue at hand. The issue is
> the definition of K, M & G.
>
>> When
>> the term GB (gigabytes) stands alone, in the computer world
>> it generally means 2^30 (except for hardware retailers).
>
> Defines "stands alone". As I've already shown that is only half true.
>
>> Rates
>> are another matter.
>
> My how convenient to ignore half of reality.
>
>> It's a confusing world. Reality is that way.
>>
>> > Popular but incorrect usage is to say that one's compter has 256MB
> memory.
>>
>> Nope, it's popular and correct.
>
> Wrong again. Popular and INCORRECT.
>
>> If you multiply 256 by 1,000,000,
>> you'll get the wrong answer for the number of bytes of memory
>> you have.
>
> Yep but then that proves MY point.
>
>> > The correct but little used but IEEE way is to say that your PC has
> 256MiB
>> > RAM.
>> >
>>
>> That would just add to the confusion.
>
> Only for the clueless.
>
>> > The HD mfg's got it right by specifying storage size the way they do.
> Some
>> > app and OS writers got it WRONG and early/sloppy computer geeks should
> be
>> > ashamed.
>> >
>> > > > The bandwidth of the classic PCI bus is
>> > > > 133,333,333.33(classic) MB/sec.
>> > >
>> > > That would be 133.33333333 MHz, I believe.
>> >
>> > Nope, the classic PCI bus is 4 bytes wide and clocks at 33.33 MHz.
> That
>> > gives a peak busrt rate of .1333333 GB/sec or 133,333,333.33 bytes per
>> > second or 133.33 MB/sec.
>> >
>>
>> Note that you said "133,333,333.33(classic) MB/sec" previously
>> (see 10 lines above). Also, 'classic' is a slippery word, and you
>> didn't define it.
>
> Nice try at the slight of hand but the thread is there for anyone to read
> for themselves.
> I got it right and you didn't even know the bandwidth of a PCI bus.
>
>> > The computer industry because of early sloppyness has made a mess of
> things.
>> >
>> > The only folks who use the 1024 meaning of K are programmers and it has
> no
>> > use for ordinary computer users. I don't understand why we all can't
> just
>> > decide to drop the early computereeze atrocity.
>>
>> Because it has become too ingrained in our culture. Get used to it.
>>
>> I'm not out to start a "thread war" here, so this will probably be
>> my last post in this thread.
>
> Smart move.
>
>