echo86,
I completely agree with
Yuka and others; you're way above the degradation (electromigration) curve for 14 nanometer processors.
The only instance in which I've even briefly set Vcore to 1.420 is when determining initial overclocking capability, or perhaps to run a quick benchmark. Afterword, I immediately return Vcore to its previous level, which is always less than 1.400 for a daily driver. To be specific, this means 1.400 in Windows as shown by CPU-Z or Hardware Info ...
not in BIOS ... which depending on LLC (Load Line Compensation) and / or Vcore offset, determines Vcore in Windows under 100% workload.
Yes, we know the Vcore spec in the Datasheets for the 8th Gen 14nm i7-8700K shows max is 1.52 (
see page 117), but we also know the spec in the Datasheets for the 4th Gen 22nm i7-4790K shows max is 1.86 (
see page 102) ... which would destroy a 22 nanometer processor in short order. There are certain items in the Datasheets that you can't take at face value, so allow common sense and experience to prevail. All is based on never exceeding 85°C under any conditions, and preferably remaining below 80°C.
There's no way an entry level budget air cooler like a 150 Watt TDP Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO on a non-delidded 6 Core 12 Thread CPU at 1.5 Vcore isn't going to throttle under a moderate workloads like gaming, nevermind a heavy or 100% workload ... AND reach an incredible 5.6GHz ... AND remain stable without serious below-ambient cooling. NO way. Period.
An 8700K at 5.0GHz with 1.35 Vcore will consume ~170 Watts running a true 100% workload, which is P95 Small FFT's without AVX. I can only guess what an 8700K would consume under the same 100% workload at 1.5 Vcore ... AND at 5.6GHz? On a 212 EVO? NO way! Not plausible. Unbelievable and unprecedented. Something doesn't smell right. Even IF you had a 0.000001% golden chip, it wouldn't stay that way for long at 1.5 Vcore!
Excessive Vcore and Core temperature can result in accelerated "Electromigration" - https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Electromigration
This prematurely erodes the traces and junctions within the processor's layers and nano-circuits, which will eventually result in blue-screen crashes that become increasingly frequent over time. As a rule, CPU's are more susceptible to Electromigration with each Die-shrink. However, the most notable exception is Intel's 14 nanometer Microarchitecture, where advances in FinFET transistor technology have improved voltage tolerance.
Here's the maximum
recommended Core voltage per Microarchitecture from 14 to 65 nanometers since 2006:
Remember to keep overclocking in perspective. For example, the difference between 4.5 GHz and 4.6 Ghz is less than 2.3%, which has no noticeable impact on overall system performance. It simply isn’t worth pushing your processor beyond recommended Core voltage and Core temperature limits just to squeeze out another 100 MHz.
Beginners Guide To Overclocking Your CPU - http://www.tomshardware.com/faq/id-...clocking-cpu-explicit-testing-guidelines.html
CT