If Bulldozer is a fail Is Ivy Bridge also a fail

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


So now the Bulldozer is better thsan the I5 and I7?
 
Ah no go back and look at it again. Phenom II won out on all other processors. The I core processors were in the middle and Bulldozer came in dead last.

Gaming_02.png
 

@ 1200P BD FX 4170 wins at any rate I am not the type to fight over les than an FPS to a few or more FPS it ridiculous all the CPUs are running the program/game FLAWLESSLY so it a moot point to try and justify a winner they all win.
 

Who gives a rat's ass??.. Seriously? all of them show the game running at more FPS than a computer monitor is capable of displaying.

And besides, you act like 5FPS is the difference between a Yugo and a Ferrari.

Intel fanboys amaze me, "My CPU can game better than yours because mine puts out 150FPS and your Faildozer only puts out 110"... Moron...... :pfff:
 

That's typically how the Intel enthusiasts have been brainwashing each other into promoting there favorite product. I just try and stay humble and AMD has been performing up to and exceeding my own personal gaming standards which is the magic 60fps or my monitors max refresh rate performance. The cheaper option for me up until now has been AMD and like I say I am more than happy with the performance for my meager uses who knows when I do my next build what way I will go but one things for sure it will be the best value option not the highest bragging rights build. I just purchased a Radeon HD 6870 for $135 so I am hoping it will keep me at the magic 60fps mark in most games on my 1680x1050 monitor and Phenom II x4 955 for the next year or two. I hope Pile driver can do what I know it can just to shut people up and make everyone stop fighting cause the truth is Intel and AMD are fantastic.
 



Well the silly thing is the hypocrisy. I've seen more than once Intel fanboys make jokes to the affect of "AMD counts on stupid people to think that higher gigahertz means better CPU"... And yet the same people I've seen do that on these forums are the same ones acting like theres a difference between 80FPS and 90.
 


Ok so Bullcrapper doesn't suck....you keep telling yourself that. AMD fanboys never ceases to amaze me. They'll do anything to fanatically defend AMD no matter how inferior their stuff is. BTW I give a rat's ass because I want the best and fastest out there. If you like buying inferior slow junk that's your problem.
 

Put it this way the more money you pay to play useless games the stupider you are I myself have been guilty of paying exorbitant amounts to play the benchmarking numbers game to try and become something of a king of the hill. At the end of the day I just had lighter pockets and I could have had the same amount of enjoyment for half the money in other words I got caught acting the fool buying the latest and greatest Intel toys.
 



LOL, you have no idea what you're talking about, and therefore you resort to bully-tactics. Go to school, take a class, or at least understand the implication of the charts you copy and paste. And, quit pretending to be a member of Anonymous. LOL, it doesn't make you "cool".

You can't stand it when presented with the fact that based on the information you yourself presented, there is nothing you can do with Intel that cant be done with AMD.

My Grandpappy always said "Its better to be thought a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt".
 

Oh yes you are really helping people out buy buying the best consumer level computer and tec toys to play games on wow you sound like such a success did you beat or last highest score ? Your the man Intel FTW its the best money can buy and it really does make you a better person and really does change your social status.
 


Look at the benchmarks the proof is right there. Clock for clock the Bulldozer can't compete with the I5 or I7. BTW you're the one who started with the fanboy garbage nice try though. Like I said if you like buying slow inferior garbage thats your problem.
 


Sure there is...gaming. Again the benchmarks show how bad it is in gaming.
 

Actually, you did on page one....

Again, you have no clue what you're talking about. Tell you what, you go ahead and keep telling yourself there is a difference in performance for 5FPS when both CPUs are running a game at 80+FPS lol. Maybe you can high-five your Intel fanboys on these forms, but you go anywhere and strike up a conversation with people who actually know what they're talking about and you'll find yourself quite embarrassed very quickly.
 


How about you go back to school and learn how to spell then get back to us.
 

Sorry Intel master would you care to spell check my writings if you go as far as to personally reticule a spelling error if you dont care to spell check for me than sit down and **** **
 


Ok lets look at more benchmarks. Not that it's going to make a difference, AMD fanboys are to blined with starry eyed fantascim to see just how bad Bulldozer is.

capture6j.png


Gaming_01.png


Gaming_02.png


Gaming_04.png


farcry.png


hardreset.png


crysis.png


metro.png


dirt.png


starcraft.png


Looks to me like the I core processors beat out Bulldozer by a good bit. BTW you're right no one said it can't game, even a Pentium 4 can play games but the fact is it's performance is garbage in gaming just like Bulldozer.
 


Aww don't get your panties twisted..it will be alright.
 
Come on FX owners a few of us have benched our machines in the graphic & displays
forum. sadly to say not one FX owner that I know of posted their machine yet.
Show everyone how great you custom built machines can be under pressure .
 

Clearly dense painfully clear ^ to think that someone invests so much of there being into something so trivial I feel very sorry for you sir and your momma as well even more so in fact.
 


They can't. They know if they benchmarked it head to head with an Icore processor it would get beaten badly in gaming..more then 5 fps like the fanboys would like you to believe.
 


Once again Im a gamer and I want the fastest and the best. I don't want slow, hot inferior garbage from AMD. If you want to spend more money on a processor that runs slower and hotter than previous generations of BOTH AMD and Intel thats your problem.
 

well go play with your precious cause all you are accomplishing here is making Intel look like dicks as well as yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.