In Pictures: The Girls Of CES 2012

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Besides the girls not being top gear, there is an even worse problem. Whoever took the pictures desperately needs a course on photography. These are the worst pictures I've ever seen. A photographer, never, never, never, uses a wide lens to take pictures of human beings. Wide lenses deform the picture and magnify the facial traits producing a very unpleasant result. If in addition the camera is in a higher plane than the subject, you get pictures with big heads, small bodies and tiny legs (number 6 is a perfect example). Next time please send someone that has a remote idea of how a picture is taken. Use moderate zoom instead of wide lens (pro photographers use 100mm equivalent for people portraits), and if that is not possible, never take the picture from a plane above the head of the subject, much better to lower the camera to a plane close to the chest of the subject ( at least you magnify the breast ;-) ).
 
@Toms

Is is your site/gallery? It is ABSURDLY SLOW. It's between 10-15 seconds between images.....wtf???????

I really wish you'd stop making us scroll through the gallery. I know it 'looks' cool, but honestly, it's totally maddening.
 
[citation][nom]gsacks[/nom]Really, you spent the weekend in Vegas, and these were the most attractive women you saw. Sad.[/citation]
Well, they decided not to photograph the girls that do roomcalls or pole dancing on Freemont, plus all the REALLY hot girls charge a lot more than these bog-standard event girls
 
what is TOSY? Since everyone assumes he is gay , are you posting pictures of trannies now? is the "article" that has no story like "trannies on screen yeah" or what? No thanks, like Ozzy said, "what's a bieber?"
 
[citation][nom]DogSnake[/nom]Boy they hire some of the least attractive women I have seen at trade shows. CES must be on a very low budget. Since it is the product that matters maybe the vendors don't care. On a 1-10 scale I give this group a 1-2 for model attractiveness.[/citation]

Too right. I bet they would have better luck hiring contestants from RuPaul's Drag Race, to serve as booth babes. Would look a WHOLE lot better!
 
what? The only one that looked like a model was number 20. If you saw most of them working at walmart you wouldn't pay attention to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.