Intel’s Second-Gen Core CPUs: The Sandy Bridge Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,875
5
19,790
Best answers
4
[citation][nom]MoneyFace p[/nom]Editor, page 10 has mistakes. Its LGA1155, not LGA1555.[/citation]

Fixed, thanks Money!
 

juncture

Distinguished
Jun 12, 2010
44
0
18,530
Best answers
0
"an unlocked Sandy Bridge chip for $11 extra is actually pretty damn sexy."

i think the author's saying he's a sexually active cyberphile
 

fakie

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2010
85
0
18,640
Best answers
1
Contest is limited to residents of the USA (excluding Rhode Island) 18 years of age and older.

Everytime there's a new contest, I see this line. =(
 

joytech22

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2008
1,683
0
19,810
Best answers
10
Wow Intel owns when it came to converting video, beating out much faster dedicated solutions, which was strange but still awesome.

I don't know how AMD's going to fare but i hope their new architecture will at least compete with these CPU's, because for a few years now AMD has been at least a generation worth of speed behind Intel.

Also Intel's IGP's are finally gaining some ground in the games department.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,875
5
19,790
Best answers
4
[citation][nom]fakie[/nom]Contest is limited to residents of the USA (excluding Rhode Island) 18 years of age and older.Everytime there's a new contest, I see this line. =([/citation]

I really wish this weren't the case fakie--and I'm very sorry it is. We're unfortunately subject to the will of the finance folks and the government, who make it hard to give things away without significant tax ramifications. I know that's of little consolation, but that's the reason :(

Best,
Chris
 

LuckyDucky7

Distinguished
May 5, 2010
303
0
18,780
Best answers
0
"It’s the value-oriented buyers with processor budgets between $100 and $150 (where AMD offers some of its best deals) who get screwed."

I believe that says it all. Sorry, Intel, your new architecture may be excellent, but unless the i3-2100 series outperforms anything AMD can offer at the same price range WHILE OVERCLOCKED, you will see none of my desktop dollars.

That is all.
 

DjEaZy

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2008
1,161
0
19,280
Best answers
0
... will wait til 'buldozer'... and two things may happen... the buldozer at the price point will kick ass... or the sandy bridge parts will get cheaper...
 

touchdowntexas13

Distinguished
Apr 13, 2009
759
0
19,010
Best answers
6
There is some pretty cool stuff going on here. I like the way the article points out the good and the bad. As for me I really am mystified at Intel's decision to only put the higher end graphics in the k-models as most likely anyone buying them will be going for the P67 platform that doesn't even use the integrated graphics. It would have been soooo much better for the HTPC crowd if there were some lower end chips with the better integrated graphics. I guess somehow this is money motivated???

As for overclocking, well it seems a bit odd in the way it is being implemented. But for $216, I can't complain too much about a quad-core with a base clock of 3.3 GHz. Some enthusiasts won't like the limited overclocking features, but others will welcome the simplified approach.

I will be building my brother a new gaming computer for graduation this summer and now I have another viable option to look at. I had planned on going with a P55 + i5 760, but now I will need to consider the P67 + i5 2500K.

Waiting on bulldozer...
 

jyar727

Distinguished
Jan 3, 2011
3
0
18,510
Best answers
0
I mean this looks like a thorough test but its really not. I wanted to see an I7 1:1 clock performance comparisons. Mainly, 3.4GHz I7-950 vs 3.4GHz I7-2600K. Obviously 3.4 GHz new tech would usually beat a 3.0 current tech in benches. UGH. lame lame lame. Really want to see this comparison instead.
 

Ramar

Distinguished
Apr 17, 2009
249
0
18,680
Best answers
0
I just bought an i5-760 system on 12/30 from newegg, I guess I wasn't paying attention to when Sandy Bridge would actually be released. It's not here yet, so I could just send the mobo and cpu back when they get here, but I don't see enough justification as a gamer to move to the 2500k. Based on the number of 1.35V 4.7ghz for the 2600k, I would assume that on stock voltage it doesn't get much higher in frequency than my 760 will, and I don't like raising stock voltage.

This is all very nice, but I'll keep my bclk control for now and maybe move up when I get out of college in seven months and the tech is set in stone and dropping in price a little.

Not a bad chip, and I'm excited to see where they go with it. =]
 

Hellbound

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2004
463
0
18,780
Best answers
0
Is sandy bridge the replacement to the x58 chipset? I thought I read somewhere they were planning on x68 sometime in 2011.
 

djdarko321

Distinguished
May 12, 2010
40
0
18,530
Best answers
0
Remember though as this is the lower end Sandy Bridge platform NOT THE MAIN LGA2011 socket. As Intel decided to release for the mainstream first before the enthusiasts this go around.
 

Tamz_msc

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2009
2,586
0
20,960
Best answers
81
Just looked at the AnandTech review and here is their opinion -

In all but the heaviest threaded applications, Sandy Bridge is the fastest chip on the block—and you get the performance at a fairly reasonable price. The Core i7-2600K is tempting at $317 but the Core i5-2500K is absolutely a steal at $216. You're getting nearly $999 worth of performance at roughly a quarter of the cost.
These things are as fast as the i7 980X and in some cases they're even faster!
 

nekromobo

Distinguished
Jul 17, 2008
110
0
18,680
Best answers
0
What if you throw something like 8k x 4k or 4k X 4k resolution video to QuickSand.. Sync :)

Nice review, but personally still not going to replace my 3.6ghz C2Quad.. when will this cpu die so I can replace it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS