You need more than cameras for FaceID. Existing Intel chipset cannot provide that capability as is. Certainly not in an efficient way. That’s the point. Do you just like to argue for the sake of it?
Reviews of the iPad Pro show how poor it is at multi-tasking and that is iOS. MacOS also isn't the best at mult-tasking either. As of October 2019 MacOS was still lacking in multi-tasking and you needed to download 3rd party applications to make it useful for multi-tasking.
I was agreeing with a previous poster. It goes without saying that you don't have to accept any statement I make.
Well, I'm not intimately familiar with GeekBench. I did try to find more information about it, before posting that. What I found is a statement that:
This gets to what I was saying about "disagreeableness". If we're on a journey together, towards enlightenment, then I'd expect you to say something like: "gee, why do you think it's questionable?". However, that statement comes across as very defensive, which tells me you're more invested in winning an argument than trying to learn and share knowledge. That might be fine for you, but not me.
I think the quotes speak for themselves. They said the increase in power was greater than the increase in performance vs the A12, which says that A13 probably can't scale much past 2.6 GHz or so.
That's ancient history, and has no real bearing on the Intel of today.
I think we can agree that it would be nice to move beyond x86.
That's your claim, but just look at the numbers. Check the specs on the lowest-end iPhone that supports FaceID and compare them with the compute capabilities of an Intel iGPU. The problem just isn't one of compute, as you claim.
If you take issue with one of my points, state your case. Don't attack me, though. That won't get you very far.
It depends on when Rocket Lake launches. I expect Zen3 will leapfrog Comet Lake (in time for the Holiday season, if you're wondering), but then Rocket Lake will put Intel back in the lead. AMD will still rule multi-threaded performance, as it looks like Rocket Lake will top out at 8 cores.
Lol... MacOS is fully UNIX compliant and is great at multitasking. You really have no idea what you are talking about.
That’s likely the optimum frequency for efficiency given this what they ship in a phone. Suggesting it “can’t“ scale higher is again a baseless claim. Especially given a higher power/thermal envelope.
FaceID is specifically dependent on the Neural Engine built into the iPhone X and higher.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. When it comes to multitasking between Windows and MacOS, MacOS in vastly inferior. Just because something is Unix or Linux doesn't mean it can multitask.
How about having to download 3rd party applications to get to the same level of multi-tasking ability. https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/multitasking-macos-apps/
You’ve clearly never worked on a Mac. You are looking at tools that modify existing behavior of built in functionality. I use both Windows and Macs on a daily basis. There is absolutely no benefit to Windows multitasking over Mac OS. Instead of pointing to an article that only shows you have no experience with Mac OS, try providing examples of what you do on a daily basis that you think you couldn’t do something of the equivalent on the Mac.
Why?!Did you just wake up from a dream or do you have any context you want to share.
I'd be curious too. Intel may have issues process-wise but as far as sales and profit are concerned, Intel is still doing better than ever.
UR saying Intels fix is a faster monolithic cpu. thats evidently not their main problem. W/o the modular architecture of amd, its an expensive and inflexible architecture.}
Meanwhile, people who got their hands on Ryzen 4700G/4750G monolithic APUs are breaking records every few days. Monolithic is clearly the way to go performance-wise when yields are good enough for a given CPU/APU size to allow it.
Intel is doing perfectly fine CPU-wise, it is only the fab process issues holding it back. Leaked Rocket Lake engineering sample benchmarks hint that Rocket Lake will likely beat Zen 3 stock vs stock.
Yeah, probably went a bit overboard on the exaggeration there. Rocket lake does look promising, and if intel gets their head outta their rear and decides on what node they are manufacturing on, it could mean even better things. Just think about if Intel went to TMSC and used their 5nm.
Then intel would loose at least 10% clocks without gaining any performance since the architecture would stay the same, it wouldn't change the power draw since AVX would still use up as much as the mobo would allow, they would decrease the volume of chips they can make by a huge amount and they would very probably pay a lot more for the waffers.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram