Utter nonsense. Intel's brand new processor outperforms AMD's almost-two-year-old chip? So it should! It's two years newer!
Tom's Hardware is so blatantly biased towards Intel these days, you should be embarrassed.
Tbh though, why does it matter if the 3600 is 2 years old or so? What matters is the cost-to-perf offered by the new chip. If the new Intel chip can give even similar perf for lesser cost (and after including an aftermarket cooler, having a more expensive chipset [MB] and also has an iGPU, which will do well for the current market situation), that is what people will get. Isn't this how AMD got into the game after 2017 in the first place? Intel opening up Mem OC and power limits for the cheaper chipsets was a great move, in lieu of the heavy competition from AMD. Its AMD's loss here that it still does not have a viable sub-$250/200 chip right now. In this cost-category, fan-bases don't matter. Only Perf-to-cost does.
The only thing we could debate as bias - is if there is some inherent bias in the way Tom's hardware skews the review towards any product.