OK, it's getting a bit ridiculous...
I simply pointed out the obvious...that the "specs" Intel has so far released--the subject of the thread, and the TH article on which the thread is based--aren't very detailed or informative. That's all. And they aren't. I am sure when Intel gets close to officially announcing the CPU as soon-to-ship that they'll do better.
Intel hasn't officially released any data yet, that will possibly happen at 27th september although that is also a leak so not officially confirmed.
We do have all the basic corner data for the cpus though, since they were leaked.
This specific article is for an additional leak, maybe they should have linked to the other leak that had this pic as well.
we also have some leaked benches from a chinese guy on bilibili which shows some improvement in general with the most important, at least in my opinion, being an up to 30% increase in minimum frame rates.
It also has some huge improvements in multi since it has more e-cores but if you run a server you are looking at different cpus all together.
The first gaming and synthetic performance benchmarks of Intel's Core i9-13900K Raptor Lake 5.5 GHz CPU have been leaked.
wccftech.com
STILL NONE OF ALL OF THIS CAN BE TAKEN FOR ANY POWER/PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION SINCE IT'S ALL JUST HEAR SAY.
(AMD numbers included, since amd as well as intel fudge their benches to make them look as good as possible)